Len takes a look back at 2023

Len takes a look back at 2023

As we get to the end of 2023 there is no doubt it has been a tumultuous year for the industry in the United Kingdom. We have experienced some significant business failures which regrettably have left a mountain of debt due to a wide range of subcontractors across the industry. Fortunately, so far at any rate in Scotland, we appear to have avoided the impact of businesses stalling and going into administration and fingers crossed during 2024 that we do not experience any casualties.

The results of the recent CICV Payment and Cash Flow Survey made grim reading, but the responses really were not surprising as many of us who advise contractors and subcontractors, felt that recently reflected what the supply chain was experiencing across Scotland this being a general slowdown in payment periods, and a reduction in the amounts that the supply chain were due. Anecdotally, some clients say that they are currently experiencing a downturn in work opportunities, coupled with a tightening of margins and there are now definite concerns emerging regarding pipeline of work in 2024.

I have set out some positives with the hope that we will see some of these issues been delivered to see a general improvement in the construction industry in Scotland. In 2024 the process of educating the industry on the Best Practice Guide which sets out some of quite simple recommendations to contractors and subcontractors to improve the way in which they manage the commercial aspects of the construction projects. Getting contractors to buy into this is especially important and in embedding these recommendations into their businesses, and already there are several pilot workshops been planned and the feedback will hopefully be positive that lessons are being learned from the solid advice that has been provided. In addition, several contractors are seeking to have internal workshops to bring their commercial and contract management teams up to speed on the SBCC Forms of Contract.

The Quality Initiative is also a great idea and I know that CICV will be supporting this and again this initiative needs to be brought in at site level to ensure that less and less projects have issues concerning non-compliant workmanship which inevitably results in the costs associated with rework and contra charges, from the contractor and the clients. It really is up to everyone reading this article who runs a construction business, to make sure that their focus is on quality, and to end the criticisms experienced by the industry because of non-compliant workmanship and defects.

There is no doubt that there is a surge towards more collaboration in the industry and as to what form that takes remains to be seen, but it strikes me from sitting on the fence that the industry does want to collaborate more closely with the employers, contractors, and the supply chain to improve performance on construction projects. This is going to be a never-ending and a long term process and needs energy and dedication to drive these changes through.

Much work is happening behind-the-scenes on the Construction Accord and in my personal opinion it is essential that the Scottish Government and the construction organisations work very closely together to achieve the objectives of the Accord, and there is no doubt that this is going to take a number of years to come to fruition, but the positive side of this is that discussions are underway and some very positive ideas and objectives are emerging.

Again, on a positive note the Conflict Avoidance Process and the Conflict Avoidance Pledge are gaining traction and we are now seeing a number of major projects having CAP incorporated into the building and engineering projects from the outset. In addition, the level of approaches to the RICS are increasing, to have 1/3 party brought in to try to resolve issues at the initial stages and avoid issues escalating into expensive and time-consuming disputes. The Conflict Avoidance Coalition will come forward in 2024 with a new structure which will focus on promotion and growth, and developing guidelines and processes, and a major conference will be held in 2025 which hopefully will attract major clients users of the construction industry and consultants, contractors, and subcontractors.

I have also been encouraged by the work of the Finishes and Interiors Sector who have appointed experienced individuals to provide Contract Reviews to FIS members. This means that when a tender enquiry comes in a tenderer can have the conditions of contract reviewed to identify any high risk clauses that might require financial recognition but hopefully the parties can negotiate out some of the unacceptable risk transfer amendments and thus start the project with a balanced and fair set of conditions of contract. It is beyond my comprehension why public and private sector clients continue to have pages of amendments to the Standard Forms and the industry needs to stand up to this type of conduct.

One question I was asked recently was – are attitudes changing and so the answer to that is yes. In my own work with a number of clients I have noted that they are walking away from employers who are only interested in lowest price, they are walking away from employers who as I say produce ridiculous amendments to the Standard Forms and there are walking away from both public and private sector clients who are either late payers, or who continually reduce the amounts due to contractors and the supply chain. I find that approach to be refreshing and hopefully it will spread throughout the industry.

So, let us take a positive view moving into 2024 and let us hope that the industry can take on some of the many recommendations coming forward, to make the industry in the United Kingdom a positive and profitable sector to be in.

Read all of Len’s blogs and get more information about all the Business and Legal Support available through the FIS here.

FIS Digital Construction Working Group Report

FIS Digital Construction Working Group Report

The meeting was chaired by Diane Tocco, Director of Diane Butterworth Limited, a longstanding FIS Member that specialises in digital solutions, initial office planning, visualisation and Revit Families.

Diane opened by reminding the attendees of the whole group objectives –

  • Establish best practices and encourage the sharing of knowledge.
  • Help appraise membership and support digital tools as they emerge in the sector.
  • Support the implementation of digitisation within organisations by influencing and educating key decision-makers and providers.
  • Simplify the understanding of emerging tools and interoperability between them.
  • Ensure engagement is active within the sector to the wider conversation of digital construction.

And the specific focussed Objectives of the day:

  • Support compliance with the more onerous Information Management requirements in the revised Building Regulations (the Golden Thread)
  • Integration of digital tools and the impact on the Golden Thread.
  • Evaluate the application of BIM to drive improvements in the delivery of training and safeguarding health.

To set the scene for the meeting Iain McIlwee revisited the progress of the Group from BIM4Fit-out to the Digital Construction Working Group and the tools and support that has been developed including:

  • BIM Toolkit
  • Key Product Data Templates
  • FIS guidance on Pre-Qualification BIM Questions
  • And the Digital Spine

This year the substantive piece of work was the development of the FIS White Paper:  Introduction to the Golden Thread and Digital Information Plans published in October.

Legislation: What is the Golden Thread?
George Stevenson, Chairman www.bim4housing.com  and Managing Director at ActivePlan Consulting Ltd

George Stevenson of ActivePlan Limited and Chair of the BIM4Housing Group update on work that FIS has supported in developing Asset Modelling that is aligned to and supporting the delivery of the Golden Thread.

Overview new FIS Guide:  Introduction to the Golden Thread and Digital Information Plans
Iain McIlwee, CEO, Finishes and Interiors  Sector

Iain then ran through the key sections and learnings from producing  the White Paper and into details of the research that FIS has conducted in 2023 to understand digital readiness within the sector.

Key findings from FIS research are that 28% of Suppliers and 72% of contractors do not currently have a Digital Information Plan in place.  Concerns we raised about information available, particularly time taken to hunt down evidence of performance, missing interface and fixing details and confusion in terms of performance scope.  Again in tender packs the lack of critical details related to product and performance were highlighted.

Open Discussion on Key trends:  Digitalisation and challenges in the finishes and interiors sector.

The discussion moved to real life examples of how the Golden Thread needs to be more clearly established at the start and more work needs to be done to define requirements upstream to ensure FIS Members are not being overloaded, overwhelmed and set up to fail.  Linking this to wider technical work (and considering digital implications of technical work) was emphasised as the biggest priority for the group.

The scale of the challenge was discussed.  Fundamentally Golden Thread is information that we have, simplistically it needs to be structured better to share it.  Concerns remain that clients don’t know what they want so aren’t providing proportionate and structured requests for information.

It was noted that every building will have its own golden thread. The contents of it will depend on and is the responsibility of the dutyholders for that project: principal designer, principal contractor and client.

The question was posed, “What defines the piece of unambiguous information used to define the beginning of the Golden Thread?”.  This is difficult to define and comes back to questions.   Simplistically this was identified as a requirement, that needs to move from performance to a prescriptive requirement, which is then satisfied by a product (and supporting evidence).  Then the Golden Thread is a digital connection between that and what was installed (check the right product was installed correctly).

The importance of System based thinking was discussed, because the next level is the context of a product within a system and ultimately the building.

Looking at the complexity of the current situation is frightening and debilitating, so it is important to remember the fundamentals. Manufacturers must start from where they are. All the data required already exists in their systems. The challenge is to put it into structured form, so that it can be mapped against the information requirements of their clients. They won’t provide it until it is asked for – it requires a client request. That client request needs to be proportionate to their requirements for data. The data requirement should be provided in a structured form too!”

To search for the simple answer it was proposed that The Golden Thread starts with reasonable questions.  Alignment and talking in the same language is a challenge, this is about clarification.  One of the problems is we have all been dumping unstructured information on each other that can’t be used.  Needs to be a client pull.   The client has to structure requests to support structured response – legislation should start to help.  Noted clients need to confirm that they have received adequate information, which encourages better interrogation and ultimately articulation of requirements.

Key questions that need to be answered clearly through the process were clarity around:

  • What was specified?
  • What was installed?
  • What was its performance?
  • Who installed it?
  • Who inspected it?
  • Who maintained it?
  • What replaced it?
  • What risks do we anticipate?

A tender, considered to be a full NBS spec, which pushed all of the design work onto the specialist contractor, all complex performance requirements (judged on pre-installation testing) and no detail.  This makes a mockery of the Golden Thread as sufficient time is not allowed and information is still being dumped.  Upgrading the way tenders are coming out, 300 drawings showing sections, but not the finite detail.  BIM is not forcing out the detail, it is still being avoided.

Noted that it is very unusual for the partition to be modelled because there is too much detail and the problem is that who is going to do it.  Partition walls are typically modelled by the architect using generic models .  If using Revit there are tools to support the make-up, normally get the model and then work with the manufacturer and detail not added til stage 4, which is too late when overlapping  with Stage 5 means contractors are being put in difficult predicaments and seen as the “bad guys” asking questions too late.  M&E Programming was also discussed as adding to the complexity.

Cut and paste specifications with several different elements being badly and inconsistently presented was highlighted as another common problem that means effective output is difficult when the right information is not received in the first place.

Ultimately the conclusion was that the Golden Thread will fail in intent unless vital design and procurement details are managed. The Golden Thread is not a plaster and  in wake of increased complexity, misaligned and badly managed tolerances, we need to emphasise the importance of the “Responsible No” and “Early Supply Chain Involvement” and standardised information requirements.

Levers for change, Golden Thread, Building Safety Act, Insurance all need to be used to accelerate the change and limit the pain in implementation of new regulations.

Swe now that we need to provide information in a more structured and efficient way.  Who is responsible is still a concern and we need to look at better understanding.  Key action to return to Product Data Templates and ensure we are capturing all the information that we need at the start and identifying scenarios where our information requirements are not being met.

As in all aspects of our activity the FIS focus of this group is observation (understanding the challenges and opportunities), standardisation (encouraging consistency), normalisation (collective action) and representation (ensuring external barriers are understood and removed).

Copies of presentations given at the meeting are available below.

FIS Guide to the Golden Thread and State of Play for Digitalisation 2023

FIS ActivePlan – Building Safety Act and Digitalisation 12-12-23

FIS BIM4H Case Study Doorsets Dec 2023

The FIS is hosting a session on Digitalisation of Fit-out:  Transformation through information at the Workspace Design Show in February and also hosting the Digital Innovation Award at the exhibition.  More details here.

To access the FIS Digital Toolkit Click here

FIS is actively seeking case studies of positive Digital Information Management to form the basis of webinars, case studies and articles in 2024.  To nominate a case study, email iainmcilwee@thefis.org.

First companies to show leadership as CCPI Demand-Side Supporters Launch

First companies to show leadership as CCPI Demand-Side Supporters Launch

Leading contractors, developers and housebuilders have stepped up to support the Code for Construction Product Information (CCPI) and signed a pledge to work with their strategic suppliers and manufacturers to drive CCPI conformance and raise standards in the industry.

Barratt Developments PLC, Berkeley Homes PLC, Mace Group, Morgan Sindall Group, Murphy, Persimmon Homes and Skanska UK, are the first companies to step up and become CCPI Demand-Side Supporters.

In becoming a CCPI Supporter, these companies are committing to supporting the CCPI and requiring their strategic suppliers and manufacturers of construction products in their supply chain to ensure that those products are either verified by the CCPI or undergoing the CCPI verification process.

The pledge includes a focus that CCPI conformance will be delivered as soon as possible and has a timebound commitment for delivery by December 2026 at the latest. To this end and wherever possible, CCPI Supporters are committed to introducing this commitment into supply agreements as a preference and prioritising working with strategic suppliers and manufacturers who prioritise delivery of CCPI verification and conformance.

The announcement has been positively welcomed by key industry organisations wishing to support this critical effort to raise standards in the industry including the Builders Merchants Federation (BMF), the Construction Leadership Council (CLC) and the Construction Products Association (CPA – which is also the organisation credited as the founder of the CCPI).

Dame Judith Hackitt, author of the Building a Safer Future Review and Chair of the Industry Safety Steering Group said,

‘It is great to see demand side companies take this lead and setting expectations for the supply chains. This is exactly what we need to see to drive the take up of CCPI’.

From the National Construction Products regulator, Duncan Johnson Deputy Director Construction Products said, “This is a very welcome initiative and an important step forward in constructing better, safer buildings.”

Amanda Long, Chief Executive of CPI Ltd, the not-for-profit organisation set-up to independently verify CCPI conformance said,

‘I warmly congratulate the first CCPI Supporters on their leadership and strongly encourage others to join them. CCPI Supporters recognise that they need to deploy products that are supplied with clear, accurate, accessible, up-to date and unambiguous product information. Products that are verified against the CCPI will help enable companies to have greater confidence in the construction product information on which they base important decisions in the construction process. Watch this space for further CCPI Supporters announcements to come!’

CCPI, having announced its first product set verifications at the beginning of September is gaining momentum with now approximately 48 companies either already through or in process for the CCPI Organisational Assessment, (which is the gateway element of the CCPI assessment process), and approximately 46 product sets (including approximately 700 products) product information either verified or in process of verification.

The launch of the CCPI Demand-Side Supporters now provides the opportunity for organisations that wish to drive positive tangible change in the sector from the demand-side to join this community and demonstrate their commitment.

If you would like to find out more about becoming a CCPI Supporter please contact: enquiries@cpicode.org.uk to request a CCPI Supporter Pledge.

Check with the manufacturer specific details before specifying walls and door openings

Check with the manufacturer specific details before specifying walls and door openings

In an environment where detailing is under constant review, we recommend that designers check with the partition system manufacturer, and the doorset manufacturer when detailing any fire resistant drylining and where fire resistance and robustness is required.

The key message here is just because a detail has been used before, don’t assume it will still be supported by the manufacturer.

CIJC Pay Rates effective from 1 January 2024

CIJC Pay Rates effective from 1 January 2024

Construction workers operating under the Construction Industry Joint Council (CIJC) agreement will see the second-stage pay increases come into effect from 1 January 2024. The CIJC pay rates were announced earlier this year, with the first stage increases effective from 1 July 2023.

In addition, the taxed travel allowance will increase by 1.5 per cent from 1 January 2024. Industry sick pay (which is paid on top of statutory sick pay) will increase to £156.33 from January 2024.

The rates should be read in conjunction with the Working Rule Agreement and Holiday Entitlement 2023.

 

FIS Calls for Protection as Payment Times Lengthen

FIS Calls for Protection as Payment Times Lengthen

Late payment continues to be a major issue for the construction industry, and the impact of the recent economic backdrop and the looming holiday season is making it worse.  According to industry insiders, current measures to address the problem, including the Prompt Payment Code and Duty to Report, are insufficient. Many in the industry view Project Bank Accounts (PBAs) as a positive step, as they ensure payment is kept separate.

However, concerns remain regarding who will take responsibility for them. Other potential solutions include direct payment from clients and a digital alternative. The government already advocates for the use of PBAs in public sector contracts, but more transparency is required regarding what constitutes “compelling reasons” not to use them.

According to Iain McIlwee, the CEO of Finishes & Interiors Sector, the voluntary Prompt Payment Code and mandatory Duty to Report are insufficient to address the payment issue in the construction industry. In fact, the situation is worsening. Contractors tend to “fatten the books” and delay payments during the Christmas season, exacerbating the problem. McIlwee warns that this is the worst time of year for the issue, making it critical to address the problem with more effective measures.

See full Construction News article