by Clair Mooney | 7 Apr, 2025 | Awards, Skills
FIS and The Worshipful Company of Plaisterers have once again joined forces and are delighted to announce that entries are now open for the annual Training Awards, an award event which recognises excellence and achievement in the recruitment, training and development of people in plastering and interior trades.
The awards, which are headline sponsored by British Gypsum, will once again showcase the very best of the sector’s occupations and the achievements of students and apprentices, supportive employers and mentors, colleges and training providers. Last year saw 11 award winners including Plastering Apprentice of the Year Paige Williams of Drywall Contracts, Interior Trades Apprentice of the Year Shaun McKenna from Errigal Contracts, and Carlisle College and NPTC College all recognised for their outstanding contributions to the sector.
The 2025 award categories will acknowledge the students, mentors and training providers who have made an exceptional contribution to learning and development in the sector.
The 2025 award categories are:
- Apprentice of the Year – Plastering Trades
- Apprentice of the Year – Interior Trades
- Apprentice of the Year – Professional
- Student of the Year – Plastering Trades
- Student of the Year – Interior Trades
- Colleges and Independent Training Providers
- FIS Member Training Programme
- Formula Trophy – supported by Formula, this award recognises contributions to the development of skills and long-term future of Fibrous and GRG plasterwork
- Training Champion
- Rising Star
- Lifetime Contribution to Training
Master Plaisterer James Minett said:
“These awards are a highlight of the Plaisterers year and enable us to recognise professionalism across the sector. We look forward to welcoming winners and runners up in our wonderful Livery Hall.”
FIS President Ian Strangward added:
“The future of our industry depends on the skills, dedication, and passion of those committed to learning and development. The 2025 Training Awards celebrate not only the students who have demonstrated outstanding commitment but also the mentors and training providers who inspire, guide, and elevate the next generation of talent. Their hard work ensures that excellence in finishes and interiors continues to thrive. Congratulations to all those who have made an exceptional contribution – your efforts shape the future of our sector.”
Entry into the awards is now open and closes on 1 August. The winners will be announced at a gala ceremony at Plaisterers’ Hall on 25 November.
For more details on entering these awards visit www.thefis.org/training-awards-home/
by Clair Mooney | 2 Apr, 2025 | Contractual and Legal, Legal cases
The case of
Workman Properties Ltd v Adi Building and Refurbishment Ltd involved the
expansion of existing facilities at Cotteswold Dairy in Gloucestershire. The dispute centred on the design responsibilities under an amended JCT Design and Build Contract 2016, specifically regarding the completion of the design to RIBA Stage 4 and/or BSRIA Stage 4. This case sheds light on several important legal principles and underpins concerns raised by FIS regarding the impact on the levels of design completeness and greater risk being pushed into the finishes and interiors sector in the face of increased building complexity and concerns related to compliance and insurability in the architectural world. The key points of the case were:
- Design Responsibility
- The court clarified that the contractor, ADI, was responsible for completing the design to RIBA Stage 4/BSRIA Stage 4 (i). This decision rejected ADI’s argument that Workman Properties had warranted the design’s completeness.
- The judgment emphasized the importance of clear contractual terms in defining design responsibilities. It highlighted that the contractor must ensure compliance with the employer’s requirements, even if the design is incomplete at the time of contract formation.
- Contractual Interpretation
- The court underscored the principle that contracts should be interpreted based on their written terms rather than subjective intentions or pre-contractual negotiations.
- ADI’s reliance on pre-contractual exchanges and subjective understandings was deemed irrelevant and inadmissible. This reinforces the importance of relying on the contract documents themselves for interpretation.
- Suitability of Part 8 Procedure
- In another concerning aspect of the judgement, the court found that the adjudicators decisions were based on an incorrect interpretation of the contract. ADI had previously succeeded in adjudications related to design obligations and financial claims.
- The court emphasized that the Civil Procedure Rules Part was appropriate for resolving the dispute, as the issues were primarily legal and did not involve substantial factual disputes. In this the court rejected ADI’s contention regarding the relevance of pre-contractual negotiations and subjective understandings (the facts of the case).
- In doing this the court’s decision clarified the contractual position regarding design responsibility, providing a foundation for resolving future disputes efficiently (setting precedence).
This case serves as a reminder of checking the design and pricing risk when confronted with an incomplete design, the importance of precise drafting in construction contracts and the limitations of relying on external factors and secondary communications for adapting the principles set down in the contract.
by Clair Mooney | 2 Apr, 2025 | Building Safety Act, Contractual and Legal, Technical
As of 1 April 2025 Ministerial responsibility for all fire functions for construction will move from the Home Office to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG). The aim of this move is to bring greater clarity and accountability to fire and building safety.
Bringing these responsibilities together will strengthen coordination, improve policy implementation, and reinforce the government’s commitment to making homes, buildings and communities safer.
The change delivers on a key recommendation from the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report, which advised that fire and building safety should be overseen by a single department.
Following the publication of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s Phase 2 report on 4 September 2024, the Prime Minister acknowledged the failings that led to the tragedy and reaffirmed the government’s commitment to implementing the necessary reforms. This transfer of Ministerial responsibility for all fire functions to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government represents an important part of this work, and the government will continue to drive forward the necessary reforms to make sure a tragedy like Grenfell can never happen again.
The Minister for Building Safety and Local Growth who will be taking on responsibility for fire functions Alex Norris said:
“Ensuring the safety of people in their homes and communities is a top priority for this government. By bringing all fire and building safety responsibilities under one department, we are reinforcing accountability, improving coordination, and taking decisive action to protect lives.
“I would like to thank Dame Diana Johnson for her work in this important area. I look forward to working with fire and rescue services and key stakeholders to implement the Grenfell Tower Inquiry’s recommendations and drive forward the reforms needed to keep people safe.
“This is a significant step in delivering meaningful change, making our buildings safer, and strengthening our country’s resilience for the future.”
Policing Minister Dame Diana Johnson said:
“It has been an honour and privilege to serve as Minister for Fire.
“I would like to express my utmost gratitude to the brave firefighters in our fire and rescue services, who selflessly dedicate themselves to protecting the public from fire every day.
“I would also like to thank the government officials and stakeholders from across the sector I have worked with over the past nine months. Their drive to make the sector stronger has been invaluable and I am certain my good friend Alex Norris will also benefit from their advice.”
by Clair Mooney | 1 Apr, 2025 | Building Safety Act, Contractual and Legal
The Scottish Government published its response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report. The response recognises that whilst operating to a different Building Regulatory environment in Scotland, the Scottish Government accepts all recommendations and will seek to use to implrement changes in Scotland.
The response confirms that the Scottish Government will continue to work with the Construction Quality Improvement Collaborative (FIS is already a supporter of the CQIC Construction Quality Charter and is encouraging members to do the same) to take forward work on industry culture, seeking to embed the principles that help to form a positive culture within industry through practice. It will also work with the Skills Working Group of the Construction Leadership Forum’s Transformation Board to establish the best approach to wider industry competence.
Alongside the response, the Scottish Government published its cladding remediation plan of action, which outlines the following key actions:
- an initial £10 million investment for those who have concerns about cladding to have their building assessed through a Single Open Call. This will be extended to cover mitigation and/or remediation works by the end of June 2025.
- finalising the Developer Remediation Contract and working with developers to accelerate progress with remediation.
- continue to take forward assessment, mitigation and remediation for properties for which the Scottish Government has taken the lead.
- continue to promote better communication with owners, residents and tenants.
Read the full response and Ministerial Foreword here.
by Clair Mooney | 28 Mar, 2025 | Main News Feed, Skills
The Skills Centre at Southwark are running new Skills Bootcamps in partnership with FIS in Internal / External Insulation and Drylining and we are seeking employers support in offering a work trial and/or potential employment to candidates that are taking part.
The Skills Bootcamps are aimed at London residents aged 19+ and start of various dates from 1 April 2025.
These intensive, hands-on training programmes are designed to equip individuals with the critical skills needed to meet our industry demands. The bootcamps will provide practical experience, industry-relevant knowledge, and career support; helping bridge the gap between talent supply and employer needs. They offer entry routes into construction and green construction as well as upskilling opportunities for those already in the industry.
If you are interested in supporting and are able to provide work experience or employment please get in touch with Beena Nana or Marie Flinter at FIS.
As part of this partnership with The Skills Centre, there is an opportunity for employers to visit the centre and see first-hand the training that is taking place. Details are below:
Date: 9 April
Time: 11-2
Address: Surrey Quays Road, Junction of Canada Street, London SE16 7PJ
by Clair Mooney | 27 Mar, 2025 | Employment
Holiday entitlement is often confusing, and with new changes introduced in January 2024, it’s more important than ever for employers to fully understand the rules.
FIS Associate Member Citation, has created a free guide for FIS members, written by HR and Employment Law experts, to provide practical advice to help businesses:
- Understand the latest legal changes
- Calculate holiday entitlement for full-time and part-time staff
- Handle accrued leave correctly
- Know when holidays can be carried forward
Whether you’re a small business or managing a large team, this guide will help you stay on top of holiday leave and avoid costly mistakes.
FIS members can download the free guide here: https://tinyurl.com/489ja7ee
If you’d like to chat about how Citation can help with the HR and Health & Safety side of your business, just give them a call on 0345 844 1111, or fill in their call-back form, and they’ll get right back to you. Remember to quote ‘The Finishes and Interiors Sector’ when enquiring to access preferential rates.
by Clair Mooney | 11 Mar, 2025 | Employment
Major changes to UK Employment Law are on the horizon, and businesses need to take action. The Employment Rights Bill, published on 10 October, introduces significant reforms that will affect employment rights, working conditions, and employer responsibilities.
Our Associate Service Provider Member Citation’s free expert-written guide helps businesses understand:
- New day-one rights
- Updated standards for workers
- Changes to trade unions
- Practical steps to prepare and stay compliant
FIS members can download their free copy here: https://tinyurl.com/sz7fhd54
If you’d like to chat about how Citation can help with the HR and Health & Safety side of your business, just give them a call on 0345 844 1111, or fill in their call-back form, and they’ll get right back to you. Remember to quote ‘The Finishes and Interiors Sector’ when enquiring to access preferential rates.
by Clair Mooney | 7 Mar, 2025 | Transformation
FIS is supporting an initiative to help transform the way small construction businesses embrace technology.
Solving Tech for Small Builders is a first-of-its-kind three-month training programme funded by the CITB Impact Fund. This free-to-join programme offers practical guidance, expert-led training, and a supportive community for those looking to integrate digital tools into their businesses.
“Having worked with over 300 businesses in the last 10 years, most builders I work with want to be able to get more information out of their heads, be able to take a step back, have better work/life balance, have more professional systems and processes in place and be more profitable,” says Maria Coulter BEM, Founder of Construction Coach, who will be delivering the programme. “Many business owners lack the headspace to research and test solutions, making guidance and support essential, unfortunately, whilst there is an industry drive to embrace digital, there is very little practical support to help businesses do it.”
Solving Tech for Small Builders is a structured, hands-on learning experience running from April to June 2025, combining face-to-face sessions in London with weekly online training. The programme will help participants get clear on their challenges and business needs, define their goals, consider what specific technology can support them in the categories of, get work, do work, get paid; embed solutions and ensure long-term success.
Key dates include the launch event on 8 April 2025 at The Flēot in London, a pioneering green and digital construction skills hub, located in Fleet Street Quarter. A live session exploring tech solutions on 13 May 2025, and the programme wrap-up on 24 June 2025. In addition, weekly 90-minute online training sessions will take place every Tuesday from 9:30 to 11am. Following the initial programme, a self-paced online version of the course will launch in September 2025, providing continued access to digital transformation resources.
Solving Tech for Small Builders offers a unique opportunity for small construction businesses to embrace new technology with confidence. Participants will create a tailored roadmap, ensuring that their chosen solutions align with their specific business needs. By joining the programme, they will become part of a supportive community of like-minded small builders, fostering collaboration and shared learning.
Small construction businesses face significant challenges when adopting technology. Many encounter short trial periods that do not allow adequate time for proper testing, making it difficult to assess the true value of digital tools. Additionally, limited support from tech providers—who often lack an understanding of the UK construction industry—leaves business owners without the guidance they need. An ageing workforce further complicates digital adoption, as some employees may be reluctant to embrace new solutions.
Solving Tech for Small Builders was put together by Construction Coach in collaboration with CITB levy payer, North London Loft Rooms and delivery partners Limes Consulting and RLB digital. It aims to bridge the gap by offering practical support to help small builders choose, test, and successfully implement the right technology for their business.
Small businesses looking to work smarter, not harder, and stand out from their competition are encouraged to sign up before spaces fill up.
Register: https://constructioncoach.co.uk/solving-tech-for-small-businesses-sign-up/
Contact: maria@constructioncoach.co.uk
Phone: 0115 9699925
by Clair Mooney | 5 Mar, 2025 | Skills
FIS is working with NCC Bircham Newton to deliver the Interior Systems Installer Apprenticeship – Ceilings pathway, early next year.
Interior System Installer (Ceilings and Partitions) Apprenticeship
The Interior Systems Apprenticeship (Ceilings and Partitions) has been developed by employers and approved by the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (IFATE). The Ceiling and Partitions pathway incorporates different ceiling and partition systems within a building.
Programme outline:
- Start dates are flexible
- 24-month programme
- 9 x 2-week immersive training blocks delivery by industry experts
- Workplace coaching sessions every 10 weeks support you and the apprentice to implement their new skills and knowledge
- 3-month end point assessment window includes a knowledge test and practical observation and questioning
National Construction College are also able to offer:
- Meet (virtual or face to face) with members to discuss and shape the programme in greater detail
- Set up a Webinar where NCC can share a virtual tour of Bircham and its facilities and answer any questions
- Facilitate a site tour of Bircham in person to any members and/or potential apprentices
If you are interested in taking on apprentices in this subject, or would like to find out more, please get in touch with marieflinter@thefis.org
by Clair Mooney | 4 Mar, 2025 | Main News Feed
FIS is pleased to announce that Justin Devaney has been elected to the position as Vice President of the FIS Board of Directors.
A member of the FIS board since 2023, Justin has 20 years’ experience working in the fit-out industry. He started on site as a ceiling installer and now holds the position of Operations Director with FIS Contractor Member Platt & Reilly.
“I have spent almost 20 years with Platt and Reilly, working in the UK fit-out industry and overseas. I have a keen interest in playing my part in ensuring the fit-out industry receives the recognition and respect it truly deserves while striving for a level playing field for all involved. I play an active role in addressing the UK’s skills shortage, having overseen the implementation of a monumental training programme within the business.” said Justin. “I look forward to working with the current board to build on the phenomenal achievements of both past and present boards.”
Commenting on the new appointment, FIS CEO Iain McIlwee said:
“I’d add my own congratulations to Justin and look forward to working with him in this capacity. Justin is a passionate advocate of better and his contributions already are helping to shape the way we are working. Justin gets that change is about inspiring and supporting the people in the community as well as influencing those around us. He leads by example and has been generous in sharing his knowledge and time for the good of the community.”
“It will be an honour to represent FIS as Vice President in 2025, and I will fulfil the role with the deference the position deserves,” concludes Justin.
You can find out more information on the FIS Board here
by Clair Mooney | 4 Mar, 2025 | Contractual and Legal, Payments
The Conflict Avoidance Coalition is launching a campaign to raise awareness of conflict avoidance and better dispute management. Conflict Avoidance Week 2025 is all about driving a cultural shift – fostering collaboration, cooperation, and communication across the construction industry. By raising awareness and sharing best practices, the Coalition wants to create:
- Stronger working relationships
- Smoother project delivery
- A more positive and productive work environment
Conflict Avoidance Week 2025 aims to highlight the importance of avoiding the time and expense associated with unnecessary disputes on construction and engineering projects. Instead, parties are encouraged to pursue resolution of issues through more collaborative efforts.
Conflict Avoidance Week will be officially launched on 24 March 2025 at an online event where delegates will hear from a range of industry professionals involved in conflict avoidance activities. You can register to join the launch event.
There will be an excellent line up of speakers, including FIS Chief Executive Iain McIlwee, our resident QS Len Bunton and Anthony Armitage from FIS member Thirdway to mention a few. They will be talking all things Pledge, highlighting upcoming activities, projects and plans, and showcasing real life conflict avoidance success stories.
The campaign encourages those associated with procurement and delivery of construction and engineering projects to commit to the Conflict Avoidance Pledge (www.capledge.org). Almost 600 organisations have signed the Pledge, indicating their commitment to maintaining business relationships and dealing with problems early and amicably. Businesses who have signed the Pledge have made this a keystone of their day-to-day commercial operations. Pledge signatories also commit to delivering value for money and working collaboratively to ensure projects are delivered on time, on budget and on par.
The Conflict Avoidance Coalition now comprises over 80 organisations, all associated with the procurement and delivery of construction and engineering projects. Participants include public and private sector clients, Tier 1 and Tier 2 contractors, trade organisations, and consultants.
The Week will be profiled via a range of events, maildrops, webinars and social media campaigns, all with a view to raising awareness.
Further information on Conflict Avoidance Week 2025, please contact the Coalition: CAPledge@rics.org
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
Ensuring prompt and full payment is critical to maintaining healthy cash flow in construction projects. This Practice Note provides best practices for preparing and managing payment applications to maximize your chances of getting paid on time and in full.
Once entitlement—such as for variations (as covered in Practice Note 4)—is established, the next challenge is securing payment. Many businesses fail to take a proactive approach to financial management, leading to cash flow problems and disputes.
This guide outlines key steps to streamline payment applications, minimize delays, and protect your financial position.
- Understanding Payment Terms and Cash Flow Impact
Before Signing the Contract:
Evaluate the impact of payment terms on your cash flow. If the terms are unfavourable, discuss alternative provisions with the Client.
Agree on a clear payment schedule before signing the contract. The schedule should specify:
- Application date
- Due date
- Final date for payment
- Deadlines for issuing payment and pay-less notices
Ensure the contract provides fair and realistic payment terms. If provisions do not align with your cash flow needs, negotiate adjustments.
- Submitting Payment Applications
Many disputes arise simply because payment applications are not submitted correctly or on time. Follow these steps to ensure compliance:
Know where to send applications. Some contracts require applications to be sent to both the Client’s/Contractor’s QS and another designated contact. Failure to comply may result in delayed or missed payments.
Use email tracking. Enable delivery and read receipts when submitting applications. Confirm that electronic submissions are accepted under the contract.
Follow contract format requirements. Ensure your application is detailed, clear, and well-documented, including:
- Quantities with supporting evidence
- Material and plant invoices
- Site instructions
- Photographic records
- Any other relevant back-up documentation
Tip: Many payment applications get rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. Make sure yours is comprehensive and meets the contract’s requirements.
- Follow-Up and Communication
Call the Client/Contractor QS after submission to confirm receipt and check if additional information is needed.
Send a follow-up email summarizing the discussion to document the status of the application.
Engage in proactive communication—don’t just rely on email; pick up the phone and discuss payment matters directly.
Before the contract begins, schedule a pre-contract administration meeting to ensure all financial procedures are agreed upon and documented.
- Managing Payment Delays and Non-Payment
If payment is not received by the final due date, you may have the right to suspend work until payment is made in full.
However, before suspending work, follow all contractual notice requirements carefully to avoid breaching the contract.
Monitor outstanding payments closely—do not allow unpaid invoices to accumulate.
Act quickly if payments are overdue. Many businesses let unpaid balances drag on, leading to serious financial strain.
Remember: It’s YOUR money. It should be in YOUR bank.
Final Advice
Understand your contract’s payment provisions before signing.
Submit applications correctly and on time.
Provide full supporting evidence to avoid rejections.
Follow up and communicate proactively.
Enforce your rights if payments are late, but always follow proper procedures.
By adopting these best practices, you can protect your financial position, improve cash flow, and reduce payment disputes in construction projects.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
This Practice Note highlights the risks associated with variations in construction contracts, including onerous clauses, conditional precedents, and the risks of performing work without formal instructions. It builds upon Practice Note 1 on Notices and reinforces the importance of the “no instruction, no work” principle.
A key challenge for both contractors and subcontractors is completing work on-site only to face disputes over payment. This PN outlines how to identify and mitigate contractual risks related to variations, ensuring proper documentation and adherence to contract terms.
- Understanding Variations and Instructions
One of the most common clauses in subcontracts requires that all variations must be formally confirmed in writing. In many cases, failure to obtain a written variation order may result in the subcontractor having no entitlement to additional time or money.
How Variations Typically Arise:
- Site managers often issue verbal instructions on-site for additional work.
- Subcontractors, keen to progress the project, proceed without formal written approval.
- When the final account is settled, contractors dispute or reject the variation due to a lack of records or proper authorisation.
- Best Practices for Managing Variations
Step 1: Always Obtain Written Instructions
If a verbal instruction is given on-site:
- Request a formal site instruction (SI) in writing from the site manager.
Email the Contractor’s Quantity Surveyor (QS), seeking confirmation that it is a variation.
- Provide a cost estimate and request written approval before proceeding.
- If no written instruction is received, do not proceed unless the subcontract allows the subcontractor to issue a variation notice. If the contract requires written approval, failing to obtain it may mean the work will not be paid for.
Step 2: Clarify the Contractor’s Position
If the contractor refuses or delays issuing an instruction, this is a red flag and a potential dispute risk. In such cases:
- Explain that the contract requires written approval to avoid future disputes.
- If the contractor insists that work must start without a written instruction, escalate the issue immediately.
- Document the request and refusal for future reference.
- Keeping Accurate Records for Variations – refer also to PN 2
Maintaining proper records ensures variation claims are substantiated. The following records should be maintained:
- A log of all variation requests with request and response dates.
- A tracker for site instructions (SIs) received and whether they were in writing.
- Photographic and video evidence of the work before, during, and after completion.
- Labour, material, and time records for all additional work.
- Regular correspondence with the contractor’s QS to ensure agreement on variation costs.
Tip: Agree on variations as they occur rather than leaving disputes until the final account stage.
- Handling Disputes Over Variations
If an instruction is disputed, or if the contractor refuses to issue a variation order:
- Red flag the issue and document the request.
- Request an official instruction allowing the work to proceed, pending valuation under the contract.
- If no resolution is reached, consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, such as the Conflict Avoidance Process (CAP), and the Low Value Adjudication Schemes.
- Readers should note however the provisions in the JCT and SBBC Contracts in Schedule Part 2, which relates to Clause 5.3 in the Contract, which allows for a Variation Quotation to be submitted, and this will include the direct loss and expense to be incurred. This brings cost certainty to the employer, and the contractor, and goes a long way to eliminate payment disputes.
- Final Advice
- Be proactive in managing variations — do not wait until the final account stage.
- Always insist on written instructions — verbal agreements are not enforceable.
- Keep detailed records — this will strengthen any claims for additional payment.
- Communicate regularly with the contractor’s QS — avoid last-minute disputes.
By implementing these best practices, contractors and subcontractors can ensure clarity, fair compensation, and effective commercial management while minimising disputes.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
Contract amendments continue to be a major issue in the construction industry, often shifting risk disproportionately onto contractors and subcontractors. This Practice Note aims to highlight key contractual risks, explain why early contract review is essential, and provide guidance on managing amendments effectively.
For those new to the CICV Best Practice Guide (BPG), we strongly recommend reviewing its contractual and commercial management recommendations to reduce disputes and improve cash flow stability.
- Why Early Contract Review Matters
Many contractors fail to review contracts until it is too late. A common scenario is when a contractor only seeks a contract review the day before work starts—by then, it’s too late to renegotiate.
Review the contract at the tender stage to identify risks early.
If amendments are unreasonable, negotiate or price the risk accordingly.
If the contract terms are unacceptable and non-negotiable, be prepared to walk away.
Tip: Some industry bodies, such as the Finishes and Interiors Sector (FIS), offer Contract Review Services to help members identify high-risk clauses before signing.
- Common Risk Areas in Contract Amendments
Below are some of the most problematic contract amendments contractors should watch for:
Payment Terms
- Amendments that delay payments beyond standard terms.
- Retention clauses that extend payment periods or increase retention percentages.
Notice Provisions
- Onerous “time-bar” clauses requiring notification of delays within a very short timeframe (e.g., 2-7 days).
- Strict notice requirements for submitting claims—refer to Practice Note 1 (PN1) on Notices for details.
Liquidated & Ascertained Damages (LADs)
- LAD amounts that are disproportionate to the subcontract value.
- No clear cap on liability, exposing subcontractors to excessive financial penalties.
Practical Completion
- Does the subcontract have its own completion date, or is it tied to the main contract completion?
- Are there unfair dependencies on other contractors’ work?
Variations and Design Responsibility
- Unclear variation procedures—refer to Practice Note 4 (PN4) on Variations for best practices.
- Expansion of Contractor Design Portions (CDP), shifting design liability to subcontractors.
- No clarity on interface issues with other trades or contractors.
Site Conditions and Title Issues
- Clauses that pass responsibility for ground conditions or existing buildings to the contractor.
- Unclear responsibilities for resolving title issues or dealing with external utility providers.
Insurance Requirements
- Contractual insurance provisions that do not align with your actual policies.
Design liability clauses that may not be covered under your Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance.
- How to Manage Unfavourable Amendments
If you encounter onerous contract amendments, you have three options:
- Negotiate the terms with the client/contractor. Many amendments can be modified if raised early.
- Price the risk—factor potential liabilities into your tender pricing.
- Reject the contract and walk away if the risks are too high.
Tip: Industry bodies and trade organisations can provide support if you face unreasonable contract terms.
- Industry Response and Conflict Avoidance
The construction industry is increasingly concerned about excessive contract amendments. The Conflict Avoidance Coalition is actively working with industry experts to address unfair practices.
If you are seeing highly unfair or unworkable contract amendments, reach out to your trade body or the Conflict Avoidance Coalition for support.
For further insights, watch the Cash Flow and Contract Webinar on the CICV website.
Final Advice
Always review contracts before signing—never wait until work is about to start.
Understand your obligations and risks—identify clauses that could impact your cash flow.
Engage in early discussions—negotiate terms that protect your interests.
Seek expert advice—use industry contract review services if needed.
Taking a proactive approach to contract amendments will help mitigate risk, reduce disputes, and improve financial stability.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | Awards, Main News Feed
FIS announced the winners of its 2025 Innovation Awards at a ceremony held at is Conference in London on 26 February.
In front of a live audience at the Business Design Centre, the winners of the FIS Innovation Awards were announced and presented. The Awards recognise and celebrate innovation in the finishes and interiors sector showcasing companies that are paving the way for greater efficiency and collaboration. The awards comprised three categories: Product, Digital and Sustainability.
All entries were independently assessed by a panel of expert judges and the winner of each category was announced in front of a live audience. The winner of each category was then invited to deliver a short pitch on their innovation to the audience, who then determined the overall 2025 Innovation of the Year winner.
The 2025 award winners are:
Innovation of the Year
XFrame for its circular build solutions
Digital
Circuland for its Circuland platform to enable material re-use
Product
Architectural Wallsz for its fire rated back-to-back headwall
Sustainability
XFrame for its circular build solutions
The awards and event were supported by sponsors Troldtekt, Procore, Simonswerk, Forza Doors, Plus Finance and SpecFinish
by Clair Mooney | 21 Feb, 2025 | Market data
Workloads reported by FIS members in the FIS State of Trade Survey for the final quarter of 2024 were mixed with just over a quarter of respondents (26%) reporting no changes and 23% seeing an increase of over 5%.
Reports of sales volumes showed that 30% of respondents saw an increase of over 5% quarter-on-quarter and looking to the next quarter (Q1 2025) the expectation for most is very positive with 60% anticipating a growth of over 5%.
Labour availability is the second highest reported factor most likely to constrain output next year (23%) with demand as the highest reported by 45%.
FIS members can access the full findings here.
by Clair Mooney | 21 Feb, 2025 | Skills
Construction trades students at Southall Community College (West London Collegeare looking for employers interested in supporting a one-week work experience placement starting on Monday 3 March 2025.
The first years’ students have completed their health and safety units and basic processes including using tools and access equipment, understanding fabrication and installation processes and materials in the workplace.
The second years students have gained additional knowledge and more intricate workshop skills in their chosen trades (Brickwork / Carpentry and Joinery / Electrical Installation /Plastering / Drylining / Plumbing and Heating / General Operative / and Motor Vehicle.)
Students’ postcodes are representative of all London boroughs (we hope to match your S106 requirements). They are either 16-18 or 19+ of age. They will have their own PPE boots. Most do not have their CSCS card yet but have good knowledge of the H&S requirements on site.
by Clair Mooney | 20 Feb, 2025 | Skills
FIS in partnership with CITB and industry experts, have developed comprehensive Competence Frameworks that outlines the training and qualification landscape and the essential Skills, Knowledge, Experience, and Behaviours for operatives and installers of Raised Access Flooring, Operable Partition Systems and Ceiling Installation.
These webinars offer a unique opportunity to explore the frameworks and contribute your insights through a wider review and feedback session. Your feedback is invaluable in helping to shape the future of these professions. Don’t miss your chance to influence the standards that will define the future of these occupations. You can register for each webinar via the links below.
Raised Access Flooring – 10 March 2025, 2pm
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/1246300591619?aff=oddtdtcreator
Operable Partition Systems – 11 March 2025, 2pm
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/operable-partition-systems-competence-framework-tickets-1249189141349?aff=oddtdtcreator
Ceiling Installation – 13 March 2025, 2pm
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/competence-framework-ceiling-installation-tickets-1252932527919?aff=oddtdtcreator
by Clair Mooney | 20 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal, Main News Feed
This Practice Note is a supplement to Practice Note 1 ‘Notice’, aimed at highlighting key specific notice provisions under NEC3 & 4 Engineering and Construction Contracts (‘ECC’) and the NEC3 & 4 Engineering and Construction Subcontract (‘ECS’).
Specific Situations Requirement Notices
Contractors and subcontractors should be aware that generally, NEC contracts contain notice provisions in respect of the following situations:
- Compensation Events.
- Early Warning.
- Defects.
- Ambiguities and inconsistencies.
- Illegal and impossible requirements.
- Prevention.
- Termination.
A brief overview these provision is as follows:
NEC3 & 4 (ECC)
Compensation Events
- The Project Manager notifies the Contractor of compensation events arising from an instruction, the issue of a certificate, the changing of an earlier decision, or a correction of an assumption (cl.61.1).
- The Contractor notifies the Project Manager of an event the Contractor believes to be a compensation event that has not been notified by the Project Manager (cl.61.3).
- The Project Manager notifies the Contractor if the Project Manager decides that an event notified by the Contractor is not a compensation event (cl.61.4).
- When requesting a quotation from the Contractor, the Project Manager notifies the Contractor if the Project Manager decides the Contractor failed to issue an early warning notice (cl.61.5).
- If the effects of a compensation event cannot be reasonably ascertained with certainty, then, in an instruction to provide quotations, the Project Manager states any assumptions made by the Project Manager concerning the effects of a compensation event (cl.61.6).
Early Warning
- The Project Manager and the Contractor notify each other as soon as they become aware of any matter which could increase the total of the Prices, delay Completion, delay meeting a Key Date, or impair the performance of the works in use (cl.16.1[NEC3] / cl.15.1[NEC4]).
Defects
- Up to the defects date, the Supervisor and the Contractor notify each other of Defects as soon as they find them (cl.42.2[NEC3] / cl.43.2[NEC4]).
Ambiguities and Inconsistencies
- The Project Manager or the Contractor notify each other as soon as they become aware of any ambiguity or inconsistency in or between the contract documents (cl.17.1).
Illegal and Impossible Requirements
- The Contractor notifies the Project Manager if the Contractor believes the Works Information [NEC3] (or ‘Scope’ as per the NEC4) requires him to do anything illegal or impossible (cl.18.1[NEC3] / cl.17.2[NEC4]).
Prevention
- If an event occurs, which neither Party could prevent, that stops the Contractor from completing the works by the date shown on the Accepted Programme, the Project Manager notifies (instructs) the Contractor on how the event is to be dealt with (cl.19.1).
Termination
- If either Party wishes to terminate the Contractor’s obligation to Provide the Works, the Party wishing to terminate notifies the reason to the Project Manager and the other party (cl.90.1).
NEC3 & 4 (ECS)
Compensation Events
- The Contractor notifies the Subcontractor of compensation events arising from an instruction, the issue of a certificate, the changing of an earlier decision, or a correction of an assumption (cl.61.1).
- The Subcontractor notifies the Contractor of an event the Subcontractor believes to be a compensation event that has not been notified by the Contractor (cl.61.3).
- The Contractor notifies the Subcontractor if the Contractor decides that an event notified by the Subcontractor is not a compensation event (cl.61.4).
- When requesting a quotation from the Subcontractor, the Contractor notifies the Subcontractor if the Contractor decides the Subcontractor failed to issue an early warning notice (cl.61.5).
- If the effects of a compensation event cannot be reasonably ascertained with certainty, then, in an instruction to provide quotations, the Contractor states any assumptions made by the Contractor concerning the effects of a compensation event (cl.61.6).
Early Warning
- The Contractor and the Subcontractor notify each other as soon as they become aware of any matter which could increase the total of the Prices, delay Completion, delay meeting a Key Date, or impair the performance of the works in use (cl.16.1[NEC3] / cl.15.1[NEC4]).
Defects
- Up to the defects date, the Subcontractor and the Contractor notify each other of Defects as soon as they find them (cl.42.2[NEC3] / cl.43.2[NEC4]).
Ambiguities and Inconsistencies
- The Subcontractor or the Contractor notify each other as soon as they become aware of any ambiguity or inconsistency in or between the contract documents (cl.17.1)
Illegal and Impossible Requirements
- The Subcontractor notifies the Contractor if the Subcontractor believes the Works Information [NEC3] (or ‘Scope’ as per the NEC4) requires him to do anything illegal or impossible (cl.18.1[NEC3] / cl.17.2[NEC4]).
Prevention
- If an event occurs, which neither Party could prevent, that stops the Subcontractor from completing the works by the date shown on the Accepted Programme, the Contractor notifies (instructs) the Subcontractor on how the event is to be dealt with (cl.19.1).
Termination
- If either Party wishes to terminate the Subcontractor’s obligation to Provide the Subcontract Works, the Party wishing to terminate notifies the reason to the other party (cl.90.1).
Final Advice
In the management and administration of NEC contracts, parties have the opportunity to act promptly and issue notices in accordance with a wide variety of contractual provisions. This not only aids in avoiding disputes by maintaining communication but also ensures certainty regarding the correct contractual position, which directly contributes to, or even governs, robust commercial management and financial outcomes.
Additional guidance notes
by Clair Mooney | 20 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Main News Feed
This Practice Note is the second in a series designed to enhance commercial management in construction projects by promoting best practices for record-keeping. Authored by experienced consultants Len Bunton, Sean Bradley, and Mark Holden-Smith, it outlines key recommendations from the CICV Best Practice Guide (BPG) to help subcontractors and contractors safeguard their contractual position.
The Importance of Record-Keeping in Construction Contracts
One of the most common mistakes contractors make is failing to maintain comprehensive records of contract events. These records become crucial if a contractual claim arises or if an employer seeks to impose liquidated damages.
As highlighted in Practice Note 1, ensuring that contractual notices are issued in compliance with the agreement is fundamental. This is particularly important when pursuing claims for extensions of time or loss and expense, as failure to provide proper notice may invalidate a claim.
A recurring issue in construction disputes is the loss of project knowledge when key personnel—such as site managers, contracts managers, or commercial managers—leave their roles. Additionally, poor management of electronic files, including missing or deleted documents, can create significant challenges. To mitigate these risks, all project records should be securely stored and readily accessible from the outset of the contract.
Key Records to Maintain
To ensure robust documentation, contractors should retain the following records:
- Essential Contract Documentation
- All tender documents.
- Emails and electronic communications (both inbox and outbox).
- Hard copies of key correspondence (recommended for larger projects).
- Meeting and Site Documentation
- Pre-start meeting minutes.
- Progress meeting minutes.
- Meeting records with subcontractors.
- Project Execution Records
- Site diaries documenting daily progress.
- Site instructions.
- Requests for Information (RFIs) with a tracker showing request dates and response times.
- Records of variations to the contract.
- Construction drawings and a maintained drawing register.
- Programme Management
- Tender programme.
- Contract programme and any progress updates.
- As-built programme (critical for extension of time claims).
- Additional programming documentation.
- Defects and Quality Control
- Snagging lists.
- Defect resolution records, including dates of client acceptance.
- Visual Evidence
- Weekly photographs with date stamps and annotations.
- Video recordings of progress and site conditions (helmet-mounted camera systems can be used to document delays, disruptions, and inaccessible areas).
- Subcontractor Documentation
- Ensure that all subcontractors also maintain detailed records, as their support may be needed for claims.
Consequences of Poor Record-Keeping
Failure to maintain adequate records can severely undermine a contractor’s ability to:
- Pursue contractual claims (e.g., extension of time, loss and expense).
- Defend against employer allegations (e.g., delays, defective work).
- Support adjudication or legal proceedings, as weak documentation reduces the likelihood of success.
Without clear and comprehensive records, a contractor pursuing an adjudication may face:
- Unsuccessful claims due to lack of evidence.
- Liability for adjudicator and consultant fees.
- Serious financial repercussions for the business.
Final Advice
“If you fail to prepare, then prepare to fail.”
Proper record-keeping is not just an administrative task—it is a critical business safeguard. By following these best practices, contractors can improve project management, avoid disputes, and ensure contractual compliance.
You can access the full guide here
Additional guidance notes
Page 2 of 62«12345...102030...>Last