Could BICS cut your electricity costs by up to 4p/kWh?

Could BICS cut your electricity costs by up to 4p/kWh?

The British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme (BICS) is a new government initiative designed to reduce electricity costs for thousands of manufacturing businesses across Great Britain.

From 2027, eligible manufacturers could save an estimated £35–£40 per MWh of electricity used, equivalent to around 3.5 – 4p/kWh, potentially reducing their total electricity bill by up to 25%.

FIS Associate Member Enexus Energy is here to help FIS members understand whether you may qualify and what you need to do next.  They have compiled the information below to answer any question and can offer members a free eleigibility check – simply email your full company name and SIC code to andy.radcliffe@enexusenergy.co.uk  or call 01253 966964 and they will support you through the process.

What is BICS

BICS will provide eligible manufacturers with relief from three policy-related costs currently included within electricity bills:

  • Renewables Obligation
  • Feed-in Tariffs
  • Capacity Market costs

The relief will be applied to the proportion of a site’s grid electricity used to manufacture eligible products. Depending on that proportion, a business may receive a 50% or 100% exemption from the applicable BICS policy costs.

This is not a discount on every part of the electricity bill, but for energy-intensive manufacturers it could still represent a substantial saving.

What could BICS be worth?

The government estimates that eligible businesses could save approximately £35–£40/MWh — equivalent to 3.5–4p/kWh.

As a simple illustration, an eligible site using 1,000 MWh — or 1,000,000 kWh — of grid electricity each year could potentially save around £35,000–£40,000 annually.

The actual benefit will depend on the site’s electricity consumption, qualifying manufacturing activity and the proportion of electricity used to make eligible products.

Could your business qualify?

A business may qualify if it:

  • is registered with Companies House;
  • has an eligible SIC code recorded at Companies House;
  • manufactures an eligible product at a site in England, Scotland or Wales; and
  • uses at least 33 MWh — 33,000 kWh — of grid electricity per manufacturing site each year.

There is also a six-month consumption test of more than 16.5 MWh — 16,500 kWh — which may be used where a full year of information is not available.

Eligibility is assessed at site level, so a business with several locations may have some sites that qualify and others that do not.

A SIC-code match is only the starting point

Your Companies House SIC code is an important part of the assessment, but it does not confirm eligibility on its own.

You must also manufacture a product included within the government’s eligible product list. Products are identified using six-digit Harmonised System — or HS — commodity codes.

Equally, not seeing an obvious SIC-code match does not necessarily mean the conversation is over. Companies House records do not always fully reflect a business’s current activities, and you will know your products and manufacturing operations better than anyone.

Any SIC information used in an application must, however, accurately represent the business’s genuine activities.

How is the relief calculated?

The level of relief depends on how much of the site’s grid electricity is used for eligible manufacturing:

  • 25% or less: no BICS exemption
  • More than 25% but less than 50%: 50% exemption from the applicable BICS policy costs
  • 50% or more: 100% exemption from the applicable BICS policy costs

Businesses will need suitable evidence to support how electricity is used at each site.

When can businesses apply?

Applications are expected to open on 1 October 2026 and close at 11:59pm on 30 November 2026.

Successful applicants are expected to receive relief from:

  • April 2027 for Renewables Obligation and Feed-in Tariff costs; and
  • October 2027 for Capacity Market costs.

The scheme is expected to run for five years, subject to the required declarations and reviews.

What information might you need?

The precise evidence will depend on the business and site, but applicants should be prepared to provide information such as:

  • Companies House details and registered SIC codes;
  • the products manufactured and their relevant HS codes;
  • annual or recent site electricity consumption;
  • electricity invoices or meter data;
  • evidence showing the proportion of electricity used for eligible manufacturing; and
  • information about shared meters, landlords or private electricity networks where applicable.

Only one application can be submitted for each legal entity in an application year, although it can cover multiple qualifying sites. Applications cannot be amended once submitted, so it is important to check the details and supporting evidence carefully.

How Enexus Energy can help

We are carrying out preliminary checks for our clients using their Companies House information and published SIC-code eligibility.

That gives us a useful starting point, but it is not a final eligibility decision. Establishing whether a business can benefit may also require a closer look at the products it manufactures, its site electricity use and the supporting evidence available.

If we believe you may qualify, we’ll let you know and explain the next steps.

If our initial checks suggest you are unlikely to qualify — but you manufacture a product that you believe may be eligible, or your registered SIC codes do not properly reflect your current activities — we would still encourage you to speak to us.

Think your business could benefit?

With potential savings of around 3.5–4p/kWh, BICS is an opportunity that qualifying manufacturers should not overlook.

Talk to Enexus Energy and we’ll help you review the initial criteria, identify what information may be needed and prepare for the application window.

Get in touch with your Enexus Energy contact to request an initial BICS review.

This information is based on published government guidance and is intended as a general overview. Eligibility and savings are not guaranteed and will depend on the circumstances of each business and manufacturing site

New Employment Rights: what you need to know

New Employment Rights: what you need to know

The Employment Rights Act represents the ‘biggest upgrade to rights at work for a generation’ and further measures will come into force next month. From 1 October, the time limit for an employee to make a claim to an Employment Tribunal will be increased from three to six months, with the following measures to be introduced from 30 October:

  • Employers will be required to prevent harassment of their employees by third parties and to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment, replacing the current legal obligation to take ‘reasonable steps’. Ministers will also be given the power to bring into effect at a later date evidence‐based steps that employers must take to prevent sexual harassment.
  • Employers will have to provide a written statement to workers informing them of their right to join a trade union. This statement must be provided at the start of a worker’s employment and at other prescribed times, and the Government is expected to publish further guidance on what it must include this month.

The Government has created a dedicated webpage with guidance and practical tools to support employers in meeting their obligations under the Act. This is being regularly updated as more measures are introduced throughout the rest of 2026 and 2027.

BSI consults on new BS 15234 Standard to replace BS 5234 Parts 1 and 2

BSI consults on new BS 15234 Standard to replace BS 5234 Parts 1 and 2

BSI committee B/544 has opened a consultation on the merger of BS 5234-1 and BS 5234-2 into a new standard BS 15234. 

BS 5234 parts 1 and 2 respectively constitute a code of practice and test methods for robustness for partitions and have remained unchanged since 1992. The standards cover most types of partitions including drylining, glazed partitions and moveable walls.

The consultation is open to all, and members are encouraged to respond with their thoughts before the deadline of 20 September using the link below. You can also volunteer through this consultation to be involved in the development process.

BS 15234: Partitions (including matching linings) – Strength and robustness – Specification

Please contact jamesparlour@thefis.org if you have questions about this consultation or would like to be more involved in the development process.

Lens Blog: Support for FIS members

Lens Blog: Support for FIS members

A day in the life of an FIS consultant

In this article, we discussed with one of our consultants Len Bunton the services he provides to FIS members and experience of the issues our members need advice on.

The process usually commences with a phone call from one of the FIS Team who has taken a call from a member needing assistance, and the first thing they have done is to put me in contact with the individuals in the organisation who are dealing with the issue.

It’s particularly important to have a fast response time, and unless for example I am tied up for a day or half a day on client business, I usually make contact immediately. The member would then send me details of the problem and I ask for all relevant correspondence which is reviewed, before arranging a meeting to discuss the issues.

In my experience, the member organisation is usually fairly well down the road in terms of having communication with the other part and the consultants are  normally required when negotiations  are not going anywhere. So, the first responsibility is to find out what the issues are, and what solutions the member organisation is looking for.

The other thing I like to establish, is if they want to continue the business relationship with the other party, and in many cases they have decided they really don’t want to be doing any more business with that organisation, and that often influences how we approach the situation

The majority of the issues we   deal with have financial implications because the issues that are in contention are inevitably leading to nonpayment. So, the priority is to establish the options available, and discuss the implications of each of these with the member.

My view is that every effort should be made to have face to face engagement with the other party and not   hide behind a load of e-mail traffic which gets us nowhere.  Often the member will advise the other party that they have engaged an FIS consultant rather than me writing to the other party out of the blue.

There are various methods of engagement and the first of these is to request a face to face meeting, or an online meeting, and to find out why the other party is experiencing non payment. If we do not make progress there, then the matter has to be escalated to senior management within the company and in my experience, they’re often unaware of the issues or have not got into any of the detail. All they know is they’re being told   the contractor is not entitled to payment.

One of the areas that readers of this article will be aware of is FIS’s support of the Conflict Avoidance Process and we are encouraging every member organisation in FIS to sign the Conflict Avoidance Pledge. That process can be relied on in these circumstances to give the parties a window to try to find a resolution, or a compromise, and if they are unable to do so then there is a prospect of bringing in an experienced industry consultant to review the issues and make non-binding recommendations to both sides. Further information can be found at www.conflictavoidance.org

If it appears to me that the member organisation has a strong case, which is well supported with evidence and records, then with great reluctance I would suggest that we prepare the documentation and issue a notice of adjudication. In about 80% of the cases where this happens,  it usually does bring the other side to the table to have a discussion and hopefully find a resolution.

Not every contractor is aware of the nuances of the adjudication process and the costs that might be involved and the risks attached. We have seen a number of cases recently where we have been successful in an adjudication, with a decision in our client’s favour, and the other side simply refuses to pay and the member has to commence enforcement proceedings which leads to further costs, most of which will be non-recoverable.

I have seen this many times and then during the proceedings the other party will come along with a compromise offer It is up to the member to decide if they want to continue the battle.

I am not a great supporter of the attitude often taken when I am told “it’s not the money it’s a matter of principle” and I just do not believe that. I think in these situations there is no space for stubbornness and the member needs to carefully consider the advice they are being given by an experienced consultant.

Despite the difficulties and concerns in the industry at the moment, I am seeing an increasing approach by parties to try to find a resolution and to move on.

So, having dealt with that issue, what other services can your FIS consultant  provide? Before I go on to that, I want to say that in many instances when somebody tells me they are not getting paid and I stick my nose in the trough,  I quite often come to a conclusion that the member organisation has not demonstrated an entitlement to payment. Either for example they have not provided enough evidence, they have not provided relevant records to support their application for payment, or in some instances the payment application is overstated.  In some cases a member organisation is claiming payment for work that they have not carried out which is simply down to human error or a lack of attention to detail. Sometimes the member has failed to comply with the payment provisions in the contract, and that is why we are emphasising the importance of having a payment schedule in each contract which must be rigorously adhered to.

So, to answer the question I have posed – one of the areas we are working on, is helping members   improve the commercial management of their contracts, so they avoid getting into payment and cash flow problems. A starting point is often carrying out a review of contracts that are coming into tender and analysing the terms and conditions to establish if there are any high risk clauses, and if there are, to try to negotiate these out directly with the client and/or the main contractor.

Member organisations need to understand the risk exposure that they have in the contract and it’s up to them either to agree to have these resolved, and even better to have them omitted completely, and if all else fails, then the member has got to take the decision – do I take this contract on with the inherent risks that have been identified or do I simply walk away?

Again, we are finding that a number of FIS memberss are doing the latter  and are declining to tender for the project because the risk exposure is far too high, and in many cases where design responsibility is involved, many member organisations are declining to tender and one of the reasons for that is they cannot obtain the appropriate professional indemnity insurance for design.

So, what else can be done? Member organisations are  now seeking some training on the JCT forms of contract and also NEC 4 and it is important that everyone in the construction business from estimating to site and contract management, and commercial management are aware of how these contracts operate, and how they should be managed and that is particularly important as far as NEC 4 is concerned.

We have also recommended to FIS that they encourage their members to follow the recommendations from the CICV Best Practise Guide, and if you are reading this article then I strongly recommend that you download this and go through those recommendations.  I am absolutely convinced that these will help you improve the commercial management of your contracts and in fact there are a couple of members who we’ve been working with recently to adopt  the recommendations from the BPG into their business and I am advised that it’s showing very positive results.

One of the most crucial aspects of this is the importance of keeping records relating to the project as it progresses. The single issue where I see that contractors applications for payments fail, or claims being rejected, is where they have not maintained contemporaneous records.

Finally, I want to touch on the very important issue of giving support to a member who is often going through a period of severe stress. Consultants need to be readily available, have a fast response time, and give honest and pragmatic advice.

Len Bunton

len@buntonconsulting.co.uk 

These monthly Blogs are designed to help FIS Members avoid common traps and build on our focus on collective experience.  They share ideas about improving the commercial management of your contracts. In other words, instilling best practice into the way FIS members run and manage their business. What I have endeavored to suggest is ways to ensure you get paid on time, and what you are due.

Improving payment practices in construction: FIS seeks member input on the next phase of reform

Improving payment practices in construction: FIS seeks member input on the next phase of reform

The publication of new retention data through Build UK’s Payment Performance Table marks a significant milestone in the long-running campaign to improve payment practices across construction. For the first time, reporting requirements now provide transparency around how retentions are being used and passed through supply chains, offering valuable insight into a practice that has impacted specialist contractors for decades.

Build UK’s latest data shows the real impact on cashflow through the supply chain.  It identifies that tier one contractors withhold retentions at an average rate of 2% and, typically, pass on 74% of the retentions withheld by their clients. The transparency has been welcomed by Government and comes at a pivotal moment, with the Commercial Payments Bill progressing through Parliament and expected to receive Royal Assent in 2027. The Bill proposes a package of measures including:

  • A ban on construction retentions
  • Maximum payment periods of 60 days in the private sector
  • Mandatory interest on late payments
  • Enhanced powers for the Small Business Commissioner
  • Expanded payment reporting requirements

For FIS, the direction of travel is positive. The principle of reform is now broadly accepted and supported across Parliament. The challenge is ensuring that the legislation delivers meaningful improvements in cashflow and business resilience rather than simply moving withholding practices into different parts of the payment process.

Introducing the FIS Commercial Draft Policy Briefing Note

As the Bill enters Report Stage FIS has prepared a detailed briefing note examining the Commercial Payments Bill and its implications for the finishes and interiors sector. The document sets out FIS’s current position, identifies areas where the Bill could be strengthened and highlights risks that could undermine its intended benefits.  It aims to support both our own engagement with Government and any work members are doing directly with local MP or wider groups.

The key questions

While FIS supports the abolition of retentions, we are conscious that simply removing one mechanism does not guarantee better payment behaviour.

Our analysis focuses on several critical questions:

  • How do we prevent retentions being replaced by delayed certification, extended verification periods or prolonged final account negotiations?
  • What safeguards are required to stop alternative forms of withholding emerging?
  • How can payment rights be enforced economically by SMEs?
  • How do we ensure the Small Business Commissioner has sufficient powers and resources?
  • What further reforms to the Construction Act may be needed to support the objectives of the Bill?

Why we need member input

As the Bill progresses, several important issues remain open for debate.

FIS is particularly concerned about:

  • The Bill getting diluted with some organisations advocating potential exemptions for certain client groups.
  • The risk of retention practices reappearing under different contractual arrangements.
  • The affordability and accessibility of replacement security products such as bonds.
  • The practical operation of payment deadlines within construction contracts.
  • Creating affordable dispute resolution processes to.

This is where member experience becomes essential.

Have your say

The FIS briefing note is therefore being issued as a consultation document to members.

We are particularly keen to hear:

  • Whether the FIS policy positions reflect your experience.
  • Examples of payment practices that could be used to circumvent the proposed retention ban.
  • Views on retention bonds, latent defects insurance and other alternative security mechanisms.
  • Evidence of delayed certification, verification procedures or final account processes impacting cashflow.
  • Suggestions for strengthening enforcement and transparency.

The aim is not to reopen the principle of reform but to ensure that the final framework delivers genuine improvement for specialist contractors and does not simply relocate financial pressure elsewhere in the payment cycle.

The next phase

FIS will continue to work closely with parliamentarians, the civil service, and industry partners as the Commercial Payments Bill progresses. We support the Bill’s objectives and believe it offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to improve payment culture within construction. However, the legislation must be accompanied by practical reforms that make rights enforceable, prevent avoidance and ensure that money flows through the supply chain as intended.

We encourage all members to review the briefing note and share their views. Your feedback will help shape FIS’s engagement during the remaining stages of the Bill and ensure the voice of specialist contractors is heard as these important reforms move towards implementation.

Building Safety Regulator publishes latest gateway data

Building Safety Regulator publishes latest gateway data

340 decisions were made across all valid Gateway Two applications with an approval rate of 82% according to the latest Building Safety Regulator data for the period 11 May to 1 August 2026. However, 300 applications (47% of the total received) were deemed invalid or withdrawn in the same period. For the first time, NHS applications – covering a range of hospital building work from maintenance to new facilities – have been reported on separately.

Decisions

Approval Rate

Median Approval Time

Invalid/
Withdrawn

New Build

45

91%

22 weeks

15

Category A & B

166

77%

32 weeks

257

Remediation

110

85%

34 weeks

19

NHS

19

84%

24 weeks

9

Total

340

82%

N/A

300

This month marks a year since the establishment of the Innovation Unit, which has determined a total of 102 new build applications in that time. 75% have been approved or approved with requirements, with the median approval time reducing from 43 weeks to 22 weeks over the last year.

The BSR has provided its first data on ‘major change’ requests. Of the 181 live major change requests, 42% are new build, 33% are Category A and B, 12% are remediation, 12% are NHS, and 1% are transitional projects. New build change requests are currently taking on average seven weeks to close, against the statutory target of six weeks.

The BSR also received 45 Gateway Three applications during the last 12 weeks. There were 29 decisions made in an average time of 16 weeks with an approval rate of 72%. No new build projects that have been through Gateway Two have yet reached Gateway Three.