Meet the #iBuiltThis2017 Finalists

Meet the #iBuiltThis2017 Finalists

The #iBuiltThis2017 competition closed for entries last week, allowing the website to switch to voting mode. Many votes were cast for all entries across the three age categories over the four-day period, which ended at 11.59pm on Sunday 1 October.

The UK public identified their favourite images, providing three clear finalists for each of the categories to go forward to the judging stage.

Our Judging Panel comprises:

  • Amanda Clack, RICS President
  • Mark Famer, CEO of Cast Consultancy
  • Brendan Williams, Founder and CEO of Building Heroes
  • Steve Coley, FIS President
  • Steve Neilson, Managing Director of Worksmart Contracts Ltd
  • Wyn Prichard, Director of Construction Skills and Business Strategy, NPTC Group
  • Jack Parsons, CEO of Yourfeed.com.

The Judges now have the task of deciding the winner from each of the below categories:

13 Years and Under

  1. Kendrick Long for his project New Three Little Pigs
  2. Evie Van Rensburg for her project My Dinky Fan
  3. Thomas Horner for his project My Scaffold Bed Bunks

14-18 Years

  1. Emily Ash for her project Wall and Cavity Synoptic Testing
  2. Amer Saeed Cheema for his project My Dream House Build
  3. Joseph Horner for his project Whole House Renovation

19 Years and Over

  1. Carwyn Jones for his project The Dragons Eye
  2. Luke Neville for his project The Great Wall Build
  3. James Horner for his project An Epic Shed

 

We are delighted that George Clarke, Architect and host of Channel 4’s ‘George Clarke’s Amazing Spaces’ will announce the three winners live at UK Construction Week 2017 on Tuesday 10 October. To obtain your free tickets to attend the event at the Surface and Materials Show main stage between 4:45 – 5:45 pm, click on this link.

Thank you to all those who entered #iBuiltThis2017 and congratulations to the nine finalists. We look forward to hearing the winners announced!

 

Encon/Nevill Long to host spray plaster event

Encon/Nevill Long to host spray plaster event

Encon/Nevill Long is hosting a Spray Readymixed Finishing breakfast event, with Knauf, on Thursday 19 October at its West London branch. FIS members are invited to attend free of charge.

Two live demonstrations of the Knauf Airless Finish will take place at 8 am and 10.30 am. Each session will include:

• Full demonstration of Knauf Airless Finish, showing how fast, clean and efficient the system is
• An opportunity to use the spray machine and see the benefits of a premixed finish
• Free breakfast for everyone who attends
• Machine set-up and finishing, with experts on-hand to offer advice on spray machines

The event will take place at Encon/Nevill Long West London, Units 6, 7 & 8 The Griffin Centre, Staines Road, Feltham, Middlesex TW14 0HS

To register your interest, please email WestLondonSprayDay@Encon.co.uk with your details, and which session you would like to attend.

 

 

 

 

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: September

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: September

A summary of last month’s data from the IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI® revealed that the UK construction sector moved into reverse gear during September.

Other key findings include:

    • Business activity falls for the first time in 13 months
    • Sharpest drop in civil engineering work since April 2013
    • New orders and input buying drop in September

To view the full report, click here.

 

#iBuiltThis2017 is open for entries!

#iBuiltThis2017 is open for entries!

The #iBuiltThis2017 competition is open for entries until midnight on Wednesday 27 September. FIS Skills has launched its image-led campaign to attract young people and promote the construction industry as a career choice. There are fabulous prizes on offer for each of the three age categories:

Age Group 19 and over
St Pancras Renaissance Hotel and The London Eye Champagne Experience

Age Group 14-18*
Chessington World of Adventures and overnight stay at the Safari Hotel

Age Group 13 and under*
Family package to LEGOLAND Windsor and an overnight stay at the LEGOLAND Castle based on a family of 4

The Judging Panel has a stellar line-up and includes Amanda Clack, RICS President and Mark Farmer, author of the October 2016 UK Government Review ‘Modernise or Die’.

The competition will run for a period of three weeks, from 4 September. Winners will be announced at UK Construction Week which takes place from 10 to 12 October 2017 at the NEC in Birmingham.

For details on how to enter the competition, there is a step-by-step guide here. To find out more and enter, click here.

*Under 18’s will require prior parental/guardian consent to enter the competition.

 

 

 

 

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: September

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: August

A summary of August’s data from the IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI® revealed the weakest upturn in UK construction output for 12 months.

Other key findings include:

    • Marginal increase in overall construction activity
    • Robust rise in house building offset by marked fall in commercial work
    • New business declines for the second month running

To view the full report, click here.

 

September edition of SpecFinish

September edition of SpecFinish

In the September edition of SpecFinish, Paul Thompson looks at the industry’s shift towards off-site fabrication.

The launch of FIS Skills’ #iBuiltThis2017 is featured on page 18. Find out how you can enter the competition to be in with a chance of winning a fabulous prize!

In the technical article, Joe Cilia looks at steel partitioning and why sales are growing.

Read more in the September edition of SpecFinish online here or the PDF version here.

 

#iBuiltThis2017 is open for entries!

FIS Skills launches ‘I Built This’

FIS Skills launches its flagship social media competition ‘I Built This’ today. As an image-led campaign, utilising the Instagram and Twitter platforms, it is designed to attract young people, those who work in the construction industry and the general public. By submitting photographs of something that they have built, using the hashtag #iBuiltThis2017 the aim is to promote the UK built environment in a fun and inspiring way.

The competition will run for a period of three weeks, with submissions being accepted from 4 September. Winners will be announced at UK Construction Week which takes place from 10 to 12 October 2017 at the NEC in Birmingham.

FIS Skills Delivery Director Helen Yeulet said: “This is a part of FIS Skills’ ongoing vision to drive change and a better understanding of the industry and the opportunities within it. The competition aims to utilise the pride in an individual’s achievements to assist in improving perceptions and image, increase careers awareness and engagement nationally.”

Chief executive David Frise added: “The only way to close the skills gap and improve industry perceptions is through strong collaboration and working together. This campaign provides the partnerships to join the dots across the industry with educators and potential new entrants and engage with young people in a fun and exciting new way.”

Read the Press Release

 

 

The Folly of Build and Design

The Folly of Build and Design

Assembling buildings as a single, integrated system
by David Frise

For a building to be a ‘product’, you have to start the process off correctly by designing it before you start. Not rocket science, but rarely achievable in the “crack on” world of construction.  Most projects start on-site far too early and well before the design is fully completed. This means that we end up not in design and build mode, but in the folly of build and design. A harum-scarum process that is desperately inefficient and leads to massive additional costs. The Get it Right Initiative estimates anywhere between 10-24% of cost stems from avoidable error, more than the total profits of all the construction industry put together. It is no wonder construction is high risk and low margin and why so many Chief Executives of major contractors have short term periods in charge.

It often appears that the building is a secondary requirement. We all invest in property, either personally or through our pensions. An investment vehicle requires less focus on specification and more on the need to be on time and on budget, to generate that return on investment. Of course, the best clients recognise that this does not pay in the long term, but there are many that do not.

This drives inefficient behaviours down the supply chain because, if you are not concerned about the quality of the product, you will not need to be concerned about the people who install it. This leads to you also not needing to worry about paying them on time. So poor payment practices are rife as a result.

The current system needs on-site activity to trigger payments down the supply chain, so we all want to see deliveries of materials and site progress to improve our cash flow. The result is cluttered sites and out of sequence works to make progress look better than it is (nothing makes a room look near to completion like a ceiling, even if the services above it are yet to be installed). This also leads to late design changes, reworking and yet more increased defects.

Build and design delivers broken buildings, while the process of delivering them causes broken people. The most likely way you will die in construction is suicide. The pressures of working in the industry, especially as a specialist contractor, are enormous as you chase slim margins and impossible programmes and if your house is on the line, this often becomes unbearable.

It doesn’t have to be this way 

Planning departments could give planning consent but not allow a start on site until the design had been completed or perhaps a Regulation 38 Fire Plan signed off by Building Control.  This would prevent the immediate start of build and design. The freeholder would pay a professional to sign off the design so there would be no additional workload on planning departments.

Of course, if the developer used BIM this process would be easier to complete. You would also encourage the use of DFMA and off-site techniques that would improve efficiency and improve safety, as fewer workers would be required on site. The same could be said for reductions in waste.

Imagine a world where buildings were assembled quickly on-site, causing less disruption to local residents and businesses and at a lower cost; buildings that not only looked like the planning application but performed to the correct standards and were defect free. This would surely be a more profitable industry that attracts the brightest and the best. We might even address our “image” problem.

 

We would like to acknowledge Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) in allowing FIS to reproduce David Frise’s article. 

Grenfell – What else are we missing?

Grenfell – What else are we missing?

The Symptoms Vs the Disease
by David Frise

Let’s look at the issues caused by regulations and lack of enforcement:-

There are rightly calls for wholesale change and after years of sniping at ‘unnecessary regulations’, we may have to reverse the attempts at cutting red tape.

But what were those regulations that were consigned to history, might they have led to this tragedy? That is a more difficult question to answer. We all complain about red tape but when asked which regulations would you like to get rid of, invariably a room full of construction specialists will be unable to name one. In fact, they will usually include some they feel should be added.

So it is not necessarily that the government has revoked some essential piece of safety regulation, it is more that they have set the tone. Regulation is an unnecessary impediment to innovation and progress, usually dreamed up by some faceless bureaucrat that the government can do nothing about, but accept and implement.

As a consequence, you have a culture of non-enforcement. The biggest complaint of specialist contractors is that building regulations are paid lip service. There are precious few prosecutions for a failure meet the requirements of building standards and none for a failure to comply with the energy efficiency targets described in Part L of building regulations. When challenged, DCLG, the department responsible for building regulations, ask “what should we do, call in the building police?”

At the very least there is a culture of neglect, as we have seen with the delays to Part B of building regulations, which include fire regulations. In fact, the role of Building Control has progressively been downgraded, with the provision of private providers, this adds a commercial dimension to the checking of buildings. It is not about doing a thorough inspection, it’s ‘can you do it cheaply’ and ‘can you help get around more expensive requirements by beneficially interpreting regulations?’

The process was clearly identified in the recently published Edinburgh Schools Report into the closure of 17 schools in Edinburgh following a wall collapse;

A number of witnesses to the Inquiry identified a desire to reduce the cost of fees as a major factor in deciding the level of provision of effective inspection of construction, rather than a serious assessment of the risks of not providing for adequate independent scrutiny

Consequently, with little or no chance of prosecution, a culture of non-compliance is prevalent. And this is portrayed, or it was until Grenfell, as a victimless crime.

This culture of neglect will hopefully be addressed and redressed with Dame Judith Hackitt, Chair of the Engineering Employers Federation, leading a new independent review of Building Regulations. The review announced on Friday as part of the continuing response to the Grenfell tragedy and is the first opportunity for meaningful review of Building Regulations in many years. At the BESA, we are encouraged by the broader focus of this review and its focus on tall buildings, compliance and enforcement.

The simple solution to addressing regulation and enforcement does not require rafts of legislation (except perhaps in fire safety), but the simple enforcement of simplified regulations, which are designed to give us a safe, healthy built environment that we can enjoy in a sustainable way. For this to work, Building Regulations and Planning Consents need to be matched to output, not theoretical models as they currently are. In other words, the process should be about what you actually deliver, not what you promised to deliver.

We are encouraged by the broader focus of this review and its focus on tall buildings, compliance and enforcement. Dame Judith’s appointment is significant, as a former head of the Health and Safety Executive and an active fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, it shows the government appreciates the importance of engineering expertise to undertake a review of this nature.

For Part L of Building Regulations, which deals with the conservation of fuel and power, for example, this would mean instead of complicated SAP and SBEM modelling, the requirement would be to meet a notional energy and carbon target per square meter. How you achieve that would be up to you as the expert designer, but you would be required to prove that you had met the target or produce an explanation of why you had not.

Someone with an engineering background, like Dame Judith, will understand what changes can be made for the future and how to make the regulations more effective.

Who will enforce it? Not the DCLG’s “buildings police”, but the freeholder of the property. They would be required to prove that the building meets the requirements of building and planning regulations and the local authority could audit a small percentage. The same principle that HMRC employs, with crippling fines for those who try to cheat the system.

We may see a future where freeholders would need to employ professional experts to carry out this task on their behalf and at their own expense. You would also have to allow scope for those who genuinely innovate and fail (not with safety of course) but otherwise you place the emphasis and responsibility where it should lie; with the freeholder.

Extra Cost?

Before we throw our hands up in horror at the additional expense, they are not being asked to do anything they are not already required to – but don’t. Surely, they intend to build the thing they put in for planning? You wouldn’t dream of getting in an aircraft that had not been tested, so why would you live or work in an untested building, when you spend over 80% of your time inside?

Our built environment has a huge impact on our society, the buildings and places we construct will be there for years. A couple of thousand pounds saved by a developer or a contractor in the short term can have huge costs long term for all of us when it comes to health, safety and economics. With 455 towers planned for London alone, the focus will be on these buildings but the same issues apply to our schools (witness the recent Edinburgh Schools’ closures because of structural safety concerns) our hospitals, offices and homes.

We have seen countless reports on the ills of the construction industry, going all the way back to the Simon Report in 1944. Almost all focus on dealing with the symptoms and not the disease. Talk of collaboration, a digital revolution and innovation will all help, but to fix this we need to start with the disease. We need to be building an entire product, not just assembling a collection of individual products. The freeholder has to want a complete product that meets design, complies with regulations and planning requirements and must have responsibility to deliver that to the population at large.

We all live in the built environment, so is it unreasonable to ask freeholders to be responsible for making sure they enhance that environment through sustainable, safe development?

The responsibility to ensure the compliance of the building with the required standards lies with the builder who should have in place proper inspection of the works, however by definition such self-managed inspections cannot be independent of the builder.

With the launch of Dame Judith’s new independent review, we are finally going to have an open and frank discussion on the regulatory system around design, construction and ongoing management of buildings. We can examine the related compliance and enforcement issues and we are ready to work together towards updated building regulations that are safer, more efficient and fit for purpose.

 

We would like to acknowledge Building Engineering Services Association (BESA) in allowing FIS to reproduce David Frise’s article. 

 

Fit-Out Top 500 has launched

Fit-Out Top 500 has launched

FIS, in association with McClelland Media Ltd, launched a Leaderboard for the Top 500 active Twitter users in the fit-out sector on 7 August. The aim of the new Leaderboard is to raise social media engagement for our members and promote the finishes and interiors sector to the wider industry.

How does the Leaderboard work?
Companies and individuals who have an interest in the fit-out Sector, including Finishes and Interior Systems such as ceilings, drylining, heritage plastering, operable walls, partitions, plastering and raised-access flooring, have been nominated to Jim McClelland who curates and manages the Leaderboard. The ranking order is determined by Klout Score. Each Monday morning, the Leaderboard updates to provide the new ranking; if you choose to follow the Leaderboard, you will be notified each Monday via email of your rank and Klout Score. Jim McClelland tweets from @SustMemeTop500, providing additional exposure for our Leaderboard, such as tweeting the Top 20, new entrants and top climbers.

How can my company or an individual feature on the Leaderboard?
For potential inclusion, simply Tweet the company or individual’s Twitter Username to @SustMemeTop500, using the hashtag #Top500ADDFitOut. Your Klout Score will determine if, and in which position, you enter the Leaderboard. To aid your Klout, get posting, talking and influencing on your social media channels. FIS looks forward to the Fit-Out Top 500 helping to raise the profile of our members to the wider industry.

If you have any questions about the Leaderboard, please contact nickysmith@thefis.org

Wait a moment while we load your Rise board
JTC August Newsline

JTC August Newsline

The latest edition of the Joint Taxation Committee’s Newsline for August can be downloaded here. This month’s hot topics include:

  • Workplace Pension automatic enrolment
  • Making Tax Digital – new timetable
  • Reclaiming Construction Industry Scheme tax
  • Time for the statutory employment test? – The Taylor Review

 

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: September

IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI: July

A summary of July’s data from the IHS Markit/CIPS UK Construction PMI® revealed that Construction growth eased to an 11-month low in July amid weakness in commercial building.

Other key findings include:

    • Weakest construction performance since August 2016
    • Commercial work falls at fastest pace for 12 months
    • New orders decline, leading to softer job creation in July

To view the full report, click here.

 

CITB Levy Deductions from Subcontractors

CITB Levy Deductions from Subcontractors

We have received advice from Liz Bridge who runs the Joint Taxation Committee, is a Tax Judge and sits on the CITB Levy Panel. Her advice is set out below;

Some firms insert a clause into their contractual terms which allow them to make a deduction for training costs of say 1.25% of the amounts payable to a subcontractor. This deduction must be made plain when subcontractors are tendering for work so no one can say it was sprung on them after the work was done. If it is not in the original contractual terms, any deduction would amount to short payment. The clause must make no reference to being in respect of the CITB Levy because it is not legal for employers to pass on their obligation to pay the Levy to any worker.

A note of caution – It is generally reported that subcontractors tendering to firms making such a deduction for training will inflate their tender price to recompense themselves for the deduction. There may also be resistance from subcontractors who are gross paid under CIS because they may know that no Levy is paid for them. Equally, there may be resistance from subcontractors who are themselves subject to CITB Levy because there is no set-off in the new Levy scheme and they will reason that they are paying twice for training.

Whilst it is possible, it isn’t always best practice.

We would like to remind FIS members that they are eligible to contact Liz Bridge or the Womble Bond Dickinson legal construction team, both services are free and can be found in the Membership Hub here.

 

FIS to launch Fit-Out Top 500 Leaderboard

FIS to launch Fit-Out Top 500 Leaderboard

On 7 August, the Fit-Out Top 500 Leaderboard will go live. FIS is sponsoring the latest online Leaderboard, the series of which is run by Jim McClelland who enjoys a high-profile social media presence on Twitter. The Leaderboards provide league-table-style Twitter rankings for the Top 500 influencers worldwide in key sectors. FIS currently features in the Top 500 for the Built Environment at position number 164, whilst David Frise sits at number 158 and Joe Cilia at number 267.

The aim of the new Leaderboard is to raise social media engagement for our members and promote the finishes and interiors sector to the wider industry.

How will the Leaderboard work?
McClelland is currently taking nominations and populating the Leaderboard; the ranking order will be determined by Klout Score. On Monday 7 August, the first Leaderboard will be published and if you choose to follow the board, you will be notified each Monday via email of your rank and Klout Score.

How can your company feature on the Leaderboard?
FIS has set the criteria to include all those who have an interest in the Fit-Out Sector, including Finishes and Interior Systems such as ceilings, drylining, heritage plastering, operable walls, partitions, plastering and raised-access flooring. To be sure of inclusion, simply send a Tweet to  using the hashtag #FitOutTop500 and include your Twitter name. 

If you have any questions about the Leaderboard, please contact nickysmith@thefis.org

We look forward to the launch of the Fit-Out Top 500 and helping to raise the profile of our members to the wider industry.

 

The FIS ladies finished Pretty Muddy!

The FIS ladies finished Pretty Muddy!

On Saturday 15 July, six staff from the FIS office in Solihull ran the 5K Pretty Muddy course in aid of Cancer Research UK.

Carole, Cath, Clair, Erika, Nicky and Sharon decided to form the team ‘Can the FIS ladies finish?’ as two FIS staff have fought the disease during the last two years.

The cold morning saw the ladies hold on to their coats for as long as possible, and the rain ensured that the course was muddier than normal. Once the warm-up was completed, they set off at 10.45am and within three minutes, they linked arms to form a barrier against the powerful jets of water kindly provided by the Fire Service!

Then followed ten obstacles which included crawling through a mud pit, scaling the A-frame, bouncing on Space Hoppers and the final slide down into the mud bath. The ladies thoroughly enjoyed the event and have so far raised £1,000 for Cancer Research UK; the photos and videos can be seen on the FIS Facebook page.

If you would like to make a donation, please visit the ‘Can the FIS ladies finish?’ fundraising page at: https://fundraise.cancerresearchuk.org/page/can-the-fis-ladies-finish

JTC August Newsline

JTC July Newsline

The latest edition of the Joint Taxation Committee’s Newsline for July can be downloaded here. This month’s hot topics include:

  • HMRC – Use of Labour Providers
  • CITB – The next Levy order
  • PAYE reporting for employment intermediaries
  • Workplace Pensions
  • Making Tax Digital
  • Taxation of termination payments
  • Fuel rates
  • HMRC unannounced visits
  • PAYE dynamic coding
  • Voluntary payrolling
  • Due dates for P11Ds
  • Employment allowance

 

Book now for the Scottish Awards Lunch

Book now for the Scottish Awards Lunch

After a successful inaugural event in 2016, our Scottish Awards Lunch will be held at the George Hotel in Edinburgh on Friday 6 October. The Lunch looks set to attract in excess of 150 members and guests; winners of the FIS Scottish Awards will be announced and presented by our guest speaker and compère Bill Copeland.

Please book your tickets via the events page here.

There are a small number of sponsorship opportunities available. If you are interested in any of these, please get in touch either by emailing clairmooney@thefis.org or call the office on 0121 707 0077.

View the event details and winners of the inaugural Scottish Awards in 2016 here, winning projects can be viewed in the image gallery.

Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry

Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry

The Government’s independent public inquiry into the fire at Grenfell Tower will examine the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the fire at Grenfell Tower on 14 June 2017. It will establish the facts and will make recommendations as to the action needed to prevent a similar tragedy happening again.

The Chair of the Inquiry, Sir Martin Moore-Bick, will soon start to gather evidence. That will include:

  • considering reports by the police, the fire brigade, safety experts and others
  • obtaining all relevant documents from whatever sources
  • contacting anyone who may have relevant information to give and who may be called as a witness

Anyone who thinks they have relevant documents or information should make sure they are retained and made available to the Inquiry.

Those with an interest are invited to help shape the work of the public Inquiry into the fire. Anyone can submit written views online or in writing. The consultation document is available to download here.

All suggestions must be made to the Inquiry team by 5 pm on 14 July 2017.

Suggestions should be sent to contact@grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk or by post to:

Grenfell Inquiry Team
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL

The Inquiry will produce a preliminary report as soon as possible, which is expected to provide answers to the most urgent questions affecting the safety of tower blocks.

For fire protection information, visit the Technical section of our Knowledge Hub here.

Free CITB Grants and Funding workshops

Free CITB Grants and Funding workshops

CITB is hosting a series of Grants and Funding workshops, including one-to-one sessions, during August. Book your free workshop to learn about:

  • Flexible and structured funds (what is available and how to apply)
  • Update on grants available, CITB products and services, and card schemes
  • Update on Apprenticeship funding, frameworks/standards, recruitment and supporting apprentices
  • Discuss your Apprenticeship needs with a CITB Apprenticeship Officer

Advisers and Apprenticeship Officers will also be available for one-to-one sessions from 1.30pm – 3.00pm to answer any questions you may have and offer information on other ways that CITB can support your business.

To find out more about how CITB can help support your business, please book a session using the links below. If you have problems booking a place, please email Shirley Ratcliffe. If you are unable to attend an event and would like more information on CITB support, please contact the customer services team on 0344 994 4455.

2 August – Bournemouth

3 August – Swindon

8 August – Fareham

9 August – Winchester

22 August – Oxford

23 August – Maidenhead

24 August – Sussex

30 August – Bordon