by Oscar Venus | 28 Feb, 2025 | Building Safety Act
Government on Wednesday 26th published its full response to the Grenfell Inquiry detailing their plans to address all 58 of the reports recommendations. The response reiterates that Government is committed to delivering a ‘strong response’ to the recommendations. The changes will be delivered using a ‘three‐phased approach’ over the course of this Parliament to deliver ‘meaningful change as quickly as possible’.
49 of the recommendations are being accepted in full by the government and other responsible organisations. As regards the remaining 9, which are all directed at government, the government accepts them in principle and makes clear in our response how we will implement them.
To coincide with the response Government published a construction products green paper, which sets out proposals for system-wide reform of the construction products sector, the regulatory regime that governs it and the institutions that must fulfil their responsibilities in assuring safe products that can be safely used.
Proposals include changes to the licensing of Conformity Assessment Bodies; mandatory data reporting; reforms to create clearer accountability for manufacturers and distributors; establishing a Construction Library; expanding the national regulator’s surveillance powers and improving the regulatory framework for products.
The response also confirms that the Building Safety Regulator will also put Approved Document B under continuous review, notwithstanding improvements implemented since 2017. The Building Safety Regulator will launch a consultation on further changes by autumn 2025.
Government will direct the Regulator of Social Housing to set standards for the competence and conduct of staff. Additionally they will be engaging a panel of experts and academics to consider how we best achieve the reform that is required in Fire Engineering. We plan to set out how we will deliver this by autumn 2025. They also announced that they will legislate to make it a mandatory requirement for fire risk assessors to have their competence to perform this critical role independently verified by a United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS) accredited certification body.
Amongst the other recommendations, one that will be particularly significant for the Finishes and Interiors Sector is response to Recommendation 21:
Recommendation 21
That a licensing scheme operated by the construction regulator be introduced for principal contractors wishing to undertake the construction or refurbishment of higher-risk buildings and that it be a legal requirement that any application for building control approval for the construction or refurbishment of a higher-risk building (Gateway 2) be supported by a personal undertaking from a director or senior manager of the principal contractor to take all reasonable care to ensure that on completion and handover the building is as safe as is required by the Building Regulations. (113.33)
The government accepts this recommendation.
We will review the impact of the new dutyholder regime in relation to higher-risk buildings, working with the sector to determine how we can go further, including introducing a licensing scheme for principal contractors where a licence may be granted on the basis of criteria aligned with the dutyholder requirements and can be withdrawn for failure to achieve compliance with the regulations.
by Oscar Venus | 28 Feb, 2025 | Skills
With a new CITB report revealing that around three times the number of apprenticeship starts in construction are needed to keep pace with demand in the sector, the Government has announced a number of reforms to apprenticeships in England to help boost numbers by a further 10,000 a year and meet its targets in key areas such as housebuilding.
With immediate effect, apprentices who begin their training when aged 19 or over will no longer be subject to the mandatory requirement to achieve level 2 qualifications in English and maths. From August 2025, the minimum duration required for an apprenticeship will be reduced from 12 to eight months, with Skills England to prioritise which apprenticeships will be shortened based on key shortage occupations. We are awaiting further details on how these changes align with the industry’s competence frameworks and will be applied to construction‐related apprenticeships.
A reminder that employers do not pay National Insurance contributions for apprentices under the age of 25 and earning less than £50,270, and CITB’s New Entrant Support Team is available to help with finding, recruiting and retaining apprentices.
by Oscar Venus | 28 Feb, 2025 | Building Safety Act
Following a meeting between Client and Professional Services members involved in the development of Higher‐Risk Buildings (HRBs) and the Building Safety Regulator (BSR), Build UK has produced an overview of the validation stage at Gateway Two and the documents that must be included in an application for Building Control Approval to the BSR. This has been made available to FIS Membership through our membership of BuildUK.
On receipt of each application, the BSR carries out an initial assessment to ensure that all the documents required have been submitted, which is known as the validation stage. With almost 30% of applications deemed invalid, we have summarised the documents that must be included in applications for both new and existing HRBs, as set out in the Building (Higher‐Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023, to help improve the success rate. This guide is intended for Build UK members only and please do not share via websites or social media.
Gateway Two remains a significant challenge and the Prime Minister has pledged an additional £2 million to support the BSR to ‘continue improving the processing for new‐build applications’. Philip White, Chief Inspector of Buildings and Director of Building Safety at the HSE, has promised to clear the backlog of applications by the end of this financial year, although this applies only to applications submitted up to July 2024. The CLC has also established a task and finish group with a number of workstreams to work with the BSR to review the application process.
by Oscar Venus | 28 Feb, 2025 | Contractual and Legal
To coincide with the Procurement Act coming into force this week, which has introduced significant changes to public sector procurement, Build UK has published an updated version of the Common Assessment Standard to ensure that it remains relevant and up to date for use by public sector clients and their suppliers.
Version 4.1 includes minor updates to the question set and associated guidance to reflect the requirements of the Procurement Act, as well as the changes to company size thresholds from 1 April. Suppliers will be required to complete the updated question set when they next go through the certification process for the Common Assessment Standard with a Recognised Assessment Body.
The new Procurement Specific Questionnaire, which has been published for use by public sector clients under the Procurement Act, confirms at paragraph 45 that the Common Assessment Standard should continue to be used for pre‐qualifying suppliers for ‘works’ contracts. It also states that where possible, public sector clients should “avoid requiring Common Assessment Standard certified suppliers to re‐input their information”, which will reduce duplication for the supply chain even further.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
Ensuring prompt and full payment is critical to maintaining healthy cash flow in construction projects. This Practice Note provides best practices for preparing and managing payment applications to maximize your chances of getting paid on time and in full.
Once entitlement—such as for variations (as covered in Practice Note 4)—is established, the next challenge is securing payment. Many businesses fail to take a proactive approach to financial management, leading to cash flow problems and disputes.
This guide outlines key steps to streamline payment applications, minimize delays, and protect your financial position.
- Understanding Payment Terms and Cash Flow Impact
Before Signing the Contract:
Evaluate the impact of payment terms on your cash flow. If the terms are unfavourable, discuss alternative provisions with the Client.
Agree on a clear payment schedule before signing the contract. The schedule should specify:
- Application date
- Due date
- Final date for payment
- Deadlines for issuing payment and pay-less notices
Ensure the contract provides fair and realistic payment terms. If provisions do not align with your cash flow needs, negotiate adjustments.
- Submitting Payment Applications
Many disputes arise simply because payment applications are not submitted correctly or on time. Follow these steps to ensure compliance:
Know where to send applications. Some contracts require applications to be sent to both the Client’s/Contractor’s QS and another designated contact. Failure to comply may result in delayed or missed payments.
Use email tracking. Enable delivery and read receipts when submitting applications. Confirm that electronic submissions are accepted under the contract.
Follow contract format requirements. Ensure your application is detailed, clear, and well-documented, including:
- Quantities with supporting evidence
- Material and plant invoices
- Site instructions
- Photographic records
- Any other relevant back-up documentation
Tip: Many payment applications get rejected due to lack of supporting evidence. Make sure yours is comprehensive and meets the contract’s requirements.
- Follow-Up and Communication
Call the Client/Contractor QS after submission to confirm receipt and check if additional information is needed.
Send a follow-up email summarizing the discussion to document the status of the application.
Engage in proactive communication—don’t just rely on email; pick up the phone and discuss payment matters directly.
Before the contract begins, schedule a pre-contract administration meeting to ensure all financial procedures are agreed upon and documented.
- Managing Payment Delays and Non-Payment
If payment is not received by the final due date, you may have the right to suspend work until payment is made in full.
However, before suspending work, follow all contractual notice requirements carefully to avoid breaching the contract.
Monitor outstanding payments closely—do not allow unpaid invoices to accumulate.
Act quickly if payments are overdue. Many businesses let unpaid balances drag on, leading to serious financial strain.
Remember: It’s YOUR money. It should be in YOUR bank.
Final Advice
Understand your contract’s payment provisions before signing.
Submit applications correctly and on time.
Provide full supporting evidence to avoid rejections.
Follow up and communicate proactively.
Enforce your rights if payments are late, but always follow proper procedures.
By adopting these best practices, you can protect your financial position, improve cash flow, and reduce payment disputes in construction projects.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
This Practice Note highlights the risks associated with variations in construction contracts, including onerous clauses, conditional precedents, and the risks of performing work without formal instructions. It builds upon Practice Note 1 on Notices and reinforces the importance of the “no instruction, no work” principle.
A key challenge for both contractors and subcontractors is completing work on-site only to face disputes over payment. This PN outlines how to identify and mitigate contractual risks related to variations, ensuring proper documentation and adherence to contract terms.
- Understanding Variations and Instructions
One of the most common clauses in subcontracts requires that all variations must be formally confirmed in writing. In many cases, failure to obtain a written variation order may result in the subcontractor having no entitlement to additional time or money.
How Variations Typically Arise:
- Site managers often issue verbal instructions on-site for additional work.
- Subcontractors, keen to progress the project, proceed without formal written approval.
- When the final account is settled, contractors dispute or reject the variation due to a lack of records or proper authorisation.
- Best Practices for Managing Variations
Step 1: Always Obtain Written Instructions
If a verbal instruction is given on-site:
- Request a formal site instruction (SI) in writing from the site manager.
Email the Contractor’s Quantity Surveyor (QS), seeking confirmation that it is a variation.
- Provide a cost estimate and request written approval before proceeding.
- If no written instruction is received, do not proceed unless the subcontract allows the subcontractor to issue a variation notice. If the contract requires written approval, failing to obtain it may mean the work will not be paid for.
Step 2: Clarify the Contractor’s Position
If the contractor refuses or delays issuing an instruction, this is a red flag and a potential dispute risk. In such cases:
- Explain that the contract requires written approval to avoid future disputes.
- If the contractor insists that work must start without a written instruction, escalate the issue immediately.
- Document the request and refusal for future reference.
- Keeping Accurate Records for Variations – refer also to PN 2
Maintaining proper records ensures variation claims are substantiated. The following records should be maintained:
- A log of all variation requests with request and response dates.
- A tracker for site instructions (SIs) received and whether they were in writing.
- Photographic and video evidence of the work before, during, and after completion.
- Labour, material, and time records for all additional work.
- Regular correspondence with the contractor’s QS to ensure agreement on variation costs.
Tip: Agree on variations as they occur rather than leaving disputes until the final account stage.
- Handling Disputes Over Variations
If an instruction is disputed, or if the contractor refuses to issue a variation order:
- Red flag the issue and document the request.
- Request an official instruction allowing the work to proceed, pending valuation under the contract.
- If no resolution is reached, consider alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options, such as the Conflict Avoidance Process (CAP), and the Low Value Adjudication Schemes.
- Readers should note however the provisions in the JCT and SBBC Contracts in Schedule Part 2, which relates to Clause 5.3 in the Contract, which allows for a Variation Quotation to be submitted, and this will include the direct loss and expense to be incurred. This brings cost certainty to the employer, and the contractor, and goes a long way to eliminate payment disputes.
- Final Advice
- Be proactive in managing variations — do not wait until the final account stage.
- Always insist on written instructions — verbal agreements are not enforceable.
- Keep detailed records — this will strengthen any claims for additional payment.
- Communicate regularly with the contractor’s QS — avoid last-minute disputes.
By implementing these best practices, contractors and subcontractors can ensure clarity, fair compensation, and effective commercial management while minimising disputes.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | CICV - Best Practice Guides, Contractual and Legal
Introduction
Contract amendments continue to be a major issue in the construction industry, often shifting risk disproportionately onto contractors and subcontractors. This Practice Note aims to highlight key contractual risks, explain why early contract review is essential, and provide guidance on managing amendments effectively.
For those new to the CICV Best Practice Guide (BPG), we strongly recommend reviewing its contractual and commercial management recommendations to reduce disputes and improve cash flow stability.
- Why Early Contract Review Matters
Many contractors fail to review contracts until it is too late. A common scenario is when a contractor only seeks a contract review the day before work starts—by then, it’s too late to renegotiate.
Review the contract at the tender stage to identify risks early.
If amendments are unreasonable, negotiate or price the risk accordingly.
If the contract terms are unacceptable and non-negotiable, be prepared to walk away.
Tip: Some industry bodies, such as the Finishes and Interiors Sector (FIS), offer Contract Review Services to help members identify high-risk clauses before signing.
- Common Risk Areas in Contract Amendments
Below are some of the most problematic contract amendments contractors should watch for:
Payment Terms
- Amendments that delay payments beyond standard terms.
- Retention clauses that extend payment periods or increase retention percentages.
Notice Provisions
- Onerous “time-bar” clauses requiring notification of delays within a very short timeframe (e.g., 2-7 days).
- Strict notice requirements for submitting claims—refer to Practice Note 1 (PN1) on Notices for details.
Liquidated & Ascertained Damages (LADs)
- LAD amounts that are disproportionate to the subcontract value.
- No clear cap on liability, exposing subcontractors to excessive financial penalties.
Practical Completion
- Does the subcontract have its own completion date, or is it tied to the main contract completion?
- Are there unfair dependencies on other contractors’ work?
Variations and Design Responsibility
- Unclear variation procedures—refer to Practice Note 4 (PN4) on Variations for best practices.
- Expansion of Contractor Design Portions (CDP), shifting design liability to subcontractors.
- No clarity on interface issues with other trades or contractors.
Site Conditions and Title Issues
- Clauses that pass responsibility for ground conditions or existing buildings to the contractor.
- Unclear responsibilities for resolving title issues or dealing with external utility providers.
Insurance Requirements
- Contractual insurance provisions that do not align with your actual policies.
Design liability clauses that may not be covered under your Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance.
- How to Manage Unfavourable Amendments
If you encounter onerous contract amendments, you have three options:
- Negotiate the terms with the client/contractor. Many amendments can be modified if raised early.
- Price the risk—factor potential liabilities into your tender pricing.
- Reject the contract and walk away if the risks are too high.
Tip: Industry bodies and trade organisations can provide support if you face unreasonable contract terms.
- Industry Response and Conflict Avoidance
The construction industry is increasingly concerned about excessive contract amendments. The Conflict Avoidance Coalition is actively working with industry experts to address unfair practices.
If you are seeing highly unfair or unworkable contract amendments, reach out to your trade body or the Conflict Avoidance Coalition for support.
For further insights, watch the Cash Flow and Contract Webinar on the CICV website.
Final Advice
Always review contracts before signing—never wait until work is about to start.
Understand your obligations and risks—identify clauses that could impact your cash flow.
Engage in early discussions—negotiate terms that protect your interests.
Seek expert advice—use industry contract review services if needed.
Taking a proactive approach to contract amendments will help mitigate risk, reduce disputes, and improve financial stability.
by Clair Mooney | 27 Feb, 2025 | Awards, Main News Feed
FIS announced the winners of its 2025 Innovation Awards at a ceremony held at is Conference in London on 26 February.
In front of a live audience at the Business Design Centre, the winners of the FIS Innovation Awards were announced and presented. The Awards recognise and celebrate innovation in the finishes and interiors sector showcasing companies that are paving the way for greater efficiency and collaboration. The awards comprised three categories: Product, Digital and Sustainability.
All entries were independently assessed by a panel of expert judges and the winner of each category was announced in front of a live audience. The winner of each category was then invited to deliver a short pitch on their innovation to the audience, who then determined the overall 2025 Innovation of the Year winner.
The 2025 award winners are:
Innovation of the Year
XFrame for its circular build solutions
Digital
Circuland for its Circuland platform to enable material re-use
Product
Architectural Wallsz for its fire rated back-to-back headwall
Sustainability
XFrame for its circular build solutions
The awards and event were supported by sponsors Troldtekt, Procore, Simonswerk, Forza Doors, Plus Finance and SpecFinish
by Clair Mooney | 21 Feb, 2025 | Market data
Workloads reported by FIS members in the FIS State of Trade Survey for the final quarter of 2024 were mixed with just over a quarter of respondents (26%) reporting no changes and 23% seeing an increase of over 5%.
Reports of sales volumes showed that 30% of respondents saw an increase of over 5% quarter-on-quarter and looking to the next quarter (Q1 2025) the expectation for most is very positive with 60% anticipating a growth of over 5%.
Labour availability is the second highest reported factor most likely to constrain output next year (23%) with demand as the highest reported by 45%.
FIS members can access the full findings here.