FIS has now submitted its formal response to the HSE consultation on the effectiveness of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work (Amendment) Regulations 2022, including the extension of PPE requirements to “Limb (b) workers”.
The issue has been a longstanding concern for sector, with members highlighting uncertainty around the application of the regulations, responsibility for providing PPE, differing interpretations across the industry, worker-owned PPE and the practical challenges of compliance.
Our response draws on feedback from members and calls for clearer, construction-specific guidance to ensure the regulations are applied consistently and proportionately and we will continue to engage with HSE on the next steps and future guidance. You can read the full response here.
FIS would like to thank members who shared their experiences and contributed to the response.
Health and Safety Toolkit
It is a core objective of FIS to help reduce risk and create a healthier and safer construction environment for all. Our H&S Toolkit aims to support our members work in this area.
See more news likes this
Amendments to the Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017
This week Kevin Hollinrake MP, Minister for Enterprise, Markets and Small Business Government opened a consultation into Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017. The consultation is looking primarily at whether the Regulations should be extended beyond...
FIS Sector Guide puts competency and building safety under the spotlight
With the construction sector under ever-closer scrutiny in relation to competency, a new Sector Guide – Competency Management Plans has been launched by the Finishes and Interiors Sector (FIS) to assist organisations in the improvement of quality and safety and ensure...
Gove’s Contract and the Challenge for the Supply Chain
This weekend we heard Rt Hon Michael Gove's (Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities) candid admission that Building Regulations were "faulty and ambiguous" in the run-up to the Grenfell Tower fire. This was, however, backed up with an assertion...