FIS has now submitted its formal response to the HSE consultation on the effectiveness of the Personal Protective Equipment at Work (Amendment) Regulations 2022, including the extension of PPE requirements to “Limb (b) workers”.
The issue has been a longstanding concern for sector, with members highlighting uncertainty around the application of the regulations, responsibility for providing PPE, differing interpretations across the industry, worker-owned PPE and the practical challenges of compliance.
Our response draws on feedback from members and calls for clearer, construction-specific guidance to ensure the regulations are applied consistently and proportionately and we will continue to engage with HSE on the next steps and future guidance. You can read the full response here.
FIS would like to thank members who shared their experiences and contributed to the response.
Health and Safety Toolkit
It is a core objective of FIS to help reduce risk and create a healthier and safer construction environment for all. Our H&S Toolkit aims to support our members work in this area.
See more news likes this
Independent review of the construction product testing regime
Last week saw the publication of The Independent Review of the Construction Product Testing Regime which was announced by government in April 2021 and was led by Paul Morrell OBE and Anneliese Day KC. The purpose of the Review was to to identify any potential...
FIS calls for payment and retention overhaul
FIS had today responded to the Amendments to the Payment Practices and Performance Regulations consultaton calling for an overhaul that will better support SMEs in the sector. The FIS response draws on recent research conducted by the University of Reading into...
Building Safety Act – defining Higher Risk Buildings
Building Safety Act FAQ: Are Hotels, Hospitals and Student Accommodation regarded as Higher Risk Buildings according to the New Building Safety Act? According to the Building Safety Act the definition of Higher Risk Building is: “At least 18 metres in height or at...