0121 707 0077

Key outcomes from the FIS Health & Safety Working Group – April Meeting

The April meeting of the FIS Health & Safety Working Group brought together members, specialists and partner organisations to address some of the most pressing health and safety challenges currently facing the finishes and interiors sector. Discussions were frank, practical and firmly rooted in site experience, reflecting the increasing need to bridge the gap between regulatory intent and day‑to‑day delivery.

Falling objects, safe working zones and RIDDOR

A major focus of the meeting was the HSE’s consultation on proposed changes to RIDDOR, particularly the expansion of reporting requirements for unintentional falling objects. Members agreed that many everyday activities in finishes and interiors work—such as drilling, fixing and board installation—carry genuine falling‑object risk, even when traditional “safe working zones” are in place.

The group highlighted that objects rarely fall straight down and can deflect or travel beyond exclusion zones, especially on constrained or high‑rise residential sites. As a result, exclusion zones alone cannot be treated as absolute protection. The consensus was that zones must be dynamic controls, supported by good planning, sequencing, tool and material control, and supervision. FIS will submit a coordinated response to the consultation, supporting clarity, proportionality and a prevention‑led approach.

Limb (b) workers, PPE and RPE

There was significant discussion around the increasing complexity of limb (b) worker status and responsibility for PPE and RPE. Members expressed frustration that legal definitions often fail to reflect how work is actually controlled through RAMS, supervision and works orders.

Particular concern focused on RPE, facial hair, and the growing use of PAPR as a default control. Members were clear that PAPR is often expensive, difficult to manage hygienically, and disproportionate for short‑duration work. While dust exposure is recognised as a serious health risk, the group agreed the industry currently lacks the clear, structured control framework seen with hazards such as asbestos. There was strong agreement on the need for practical FIS guidance to support risk‑based, defensible decision‑making.

Board lifters – suitability, risk and dynamic assessment

The use of board lifters generated one of the most detailed discussions of the meeting. Members consistently reported that board lifters are rarely used in practice, not through resistance, but due to genuine constraints such as space, congestion, board size, ceiling height and set‑up time.

The group highlighted that regulators are increasingly less concerned about whether board lifters are present, and more focused on whether decisions not to use them are supported by a documented, task‑specific dynamic risk assessment. Risks associated with board lifters—including instability, falling boards, fatigue and potential lone‑working—must be balanced against manual handling benefits. A simple pre‑use checklist already used by members will be shared to strengthen FIS guidance.

Innovation and safer ways of working

Members welcomed innovation that better aligns equipment with real site conditions. BRAVI Platforms presented the Solo Gyps attachment, designed to support safer board installation from MEWPs. While innovation was encouraged, members stressed that space, access, sequencing, training and RAMS integration remain critical to determining suitability on site.

New SFS Safe Working Practices Guidance

FIS confirmed completion of new SFS Safe Working Practices Guidance, developed with sector input. The guidance places strong emphasis on falling‑object risk, collective protection, dynamic exclusion zones, and pre‑construction planning under CDM. Members welcomed it as a practical benchmark that also strengthens conversations with principal contractors and clients where access or sequencing is inadequate.

Manual handling training – strong member engagement

There was strong, collective support for the new drylining‑specific manual handling e‑learning course, now approaching launch. A broad cross‑section of members volunteered to assist with final review, helping ensure the training reflects real tasks, constraints and site pressures rather than generic assumptions.

Powered access and IPAF collaboration

IPAF provided a comprehensive update on powered access safety, sharing accident trends, global safety campaigns and new British Standards for MEWPs and mast climbing work platforms. Members welcomed closer collaboration with IPAF, particularly around recovery and rescue planning, data sharing, and alignment of training and standards with site realities.

Pallet handling and materials movement

The group revisited risks created by plasterboard pallet design, particularly where bearers prevent safe pallet‑truck access. A bespoke pallet‑truck concept was presented as a potential solution. Discussion focused on braking requirements, site acceptance, trialling and the importance of engaging manufacturers to address risk at source.

Dust control and occupational health

Under Any Other Business, members discussed increasing enforcement attention on dust control, including the growing move away from dry sweeping towards vacuum‑based solutions. While practical challenges remain, the group acknowledged the direction of travel and reinforced the need for better planning, segregation and extraction. Members also noted increasing client and insurer demands for occupational health evidence relating to dust, HAVS and noise.


Get Involved – Help Shape Practical Guidance for the Sector

What’s Next?

Following the April meeting, the FIS Health & Safety Working Group has established a number of task and finish groups to turn discussion into practical guidance and tools for members:

  • RIDDOR Consultation – Falling Objects and Safe Working Zones
    Developing a coordinated FIS response focused on proportionality, prevention and real‑world working conditions.
  • Limb (b) Workers, PPE and RPE (including PAPR)
    Producing practical guidance on responsibility, RAMS ownership and defensible, risk‑based approaches to PPE and RPE.
  • Board Lifters – Dynamic Risk Assessment and Guidance Review
    Strengthening guidance on suitability, limitations and dynamic, task‑specific decision‑making.
  • Board Lifter Innovation and Mechanisation
    Exploring longer‑term solutions, including powered and platform‑integrated lifting systems.
  • Manual Handling – Drylining‑Specific E‑Learning Review
    Finalising sector‑relevant training with strong member involvement before launch.
  • Construction Dust – Planning, Control and Monitoring
    Supporting better planning, control hierarchy application and client engagement on dust risk.
  • Plasterboard Pallet Handling and Pallet Trucks
    Investigating safer handling solutions and potential manufacturer engagement.
  • Annual FIS Health & Safety Survey
    Reviewing and refining survey questions to ensure data continues to drive meaningful improvement.

Members are encouraged to get involved—participation ensures FIS guidance remains practical, proportionate and grounded in real site experience. To find out more, contact the FIS team.

Members can download full (draft) minutes of the meeting here

You can access the FIS H&S Toolkit here